Re: CVS help

2000-08-24 Thread Calvin Williamson
On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 06:15:16PM -0700, Mathew Yeates wrote: > > Can somebody tell me the steps I need to take in order > to get the latest Hollywood (deep image support) version? > > TIA > > Mathew Though not for the faint of heart, you have two ways to get it... 1) Get it from film.gimp.

Re: api break before release

2000-08-24 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 01:08:42 +0200 From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> There were no API changes at all. All of the names that are standard now have been around for a long time and the only thing we did was to reverse the logic of the COMPAT_CRUFT defines. What was

CVS help

2000-08-24 Thread Mathew Yeates
Can somebody tell me the steps I need to take in order to get the latest Hollywood (deep image support) version? TIA Mathew

Re: resource management...

2000-08-24 Thread christopher baus
> >Anyway, it seems nobody has the time and energy to really work on the >needed changes in script-fu to make it a viable programming environment. > > > More generally is it possible for script-fu scripts to introduce memory > > leaks even tough scheme in itself is a garbage collected language? >

Re: resource management...

2000-08-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, > Secondly, I'm confused by the function gimp-file-save. Specifically why do > I need to pass an image and a drawable? If I load an image, do some image > level manipulations on it, and then want to save it with gimp-image-save, > do I need to create a layer? most save plug-ins can not

Re: resource management...

2000-08-24 Thread David Bonnell
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote: > > More generally is it possible for script-fu scripts to introduce memory > > leaks even tough scheme in itself is a garbage collected language? > I think that if a script terminates unexpectedly it leaks all GIMP resources that it created. If the res

Re: resource management...

2000-08-24 Thread Kevin Turner
On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 03:06:10PM -0700, christopher baus wrote: > Secondly, I'm confused by the function gimp-file-save. Specifically why do > I need to pass an image and a drawable? If I load an image, do some image > level manipulations on it, and then want to save it with gimp-image-save,

Re: resource management...

2000-08-24 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 03:06:10PM -0700, christopher baus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > something like perl, but that's IMHO. I know a lot of people aren't down > with functional programming languages. (... like perl ;) Anyway, it seems nobody has the time and energy to really work on the nee

Re: api break before release

2000-08-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, > While, in theory, I agree that having compatibility cruft inside a > software package is bad, I think breaking compatibility deep within a > feature freeze was a very bad idea. > > I thought different this afternoon when I could just enable > GIMP_COMPAT_CRUFT_STH, but it just turned out t

suggestion for gimp man page

2000-08-24 Thread Bryan Henderson
I recently became a gimp user and have the following suggestion for an addition to the gimp man page that would have saved me some time. I have Version 1.0.4 of gimp. The ENVIRONMENT VARIABLES section needs to include GIMP_DATADIR and GIMP_DIRECTORY. I learned by reading source code that I need

resource management...

2000-08-24 Thread christopher baus
Good Day, While I've messed around with the gimp for a few years, now that I have a digital camera, I'm getting started with gimp programming. FYI, I'm a seasoned programmer, so I won't post any general programming questions... First off I think the gimp's architecture is totally cool, as it

api break before release

2000-08-24 Thread Marc Lehmann
While, in theory, I agree that having compatibility cruft inside a software package is bad, I think breaking compatibility deep within a feature freeze was a very bad idea. I thought different this afternoon when I could just enable GIMP_COMPAT_CRUFT_STH, but it just turned out that this define o

Re: [Gimp-print-devel] libgimp COMPAT_CRUFT now disabled by default

2000-08-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, > Are you not cleaning up CAN_HANDLE_INDEXED and friends? you are right, we should have done this earlier. I've done it now. Salut, Sven

Re: [Gimp-print-devel] libgimp COMPAT_CRUFT now disabled by default

2000-08-24 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 12:14:20 +0200 From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in a final move to finish the 1.2 libgimp API we have changed the logic of the COMPAT_CRUFT definitions in libgimp. The compatibility definitions from gimpcompat.h and gimpenums.h are no longer included

Re: [Gimp-print-devel] libgimp COMPAT_CRUFT now disabled by default

2000-08-24 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Thanks! -- Robert Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/ Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project lead for The Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "

libgimp COMPAT_CRUFT now disabled by default

2000-08-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, in a final move to finish the 1.2 libgimp API we have changed the logic of the COMPAT_CRUFT definitions in libgimp. The compatibility definitions from gimpcompat.h and gimpenums.h are no longer included by default. Old plug-ins that use the 1.0 API will therefore not compile against the 1.2