On Sat, Apr 08, 2000 at 01:24:53AM +0300, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have no idea what would be a good way to implement this, or how the
> user interface could look. Probably one would need to keep a bitmap of
> dirty pixel blocks (or whetever they are called), and when saving, i
I think it would be a very useful feature to be able to open a JPEG in
the GIMP, do some editing that touches just a small minority of the
pixels like correcting red-eyes, and save just the edited parts,
keeping the rest of the JPEG unchanged. (Not talking about individual
pixels, of course, but t
Jon Winters ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The only manipulation I can think of that would benefit from "lossless"
> jpeg would be rotating the image. (if I were shooting low-rez) I
> remember seeing some tools at the JPEG F.A.Q. site that would rotate a
> JPEG without damage. http://www.faqs.org
