At 02:55 PM 09/27/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>For printing I'm sending the high resolution files to a company that
>outputs them to photographic paper. I have no idea what they use to make
>the prints but the quality is fantastic.
I have something I need to get printed which I designed using the GIM
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 22:36:05 -0500
From: Jon Winters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Robert L Krawitz wrote:
>
> To the Editor of Popular Photography:
>
> In your article "Expanding the Palette" in the October 2000 issue, you
> listed several
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
> Web image editing is much lower resolution than photo editing/print
> image creation. More interesting for this purpose would be people who
> use the Gimp for fine art or such.
I am currently using my third digital camera, a Nikon Coolpix 950 and I
Robert L Krawitz wrote:
>
> To the Editor of Popular Photography:
>
> In your article "Expanding the Palette" in the October 2000 issue, you
> listed several software products available for image editing and
> painting in a box on page 62. I was disappointed not to
To the Editor of Popular Photography:
In your article "Expanding the Palette" in the October 2000 issue, you
listed several software products available for image editing and
painting in a box on page 62. I was disappointed not to see The GIMP
not included in this roundup. This is a
