Hi Gary,
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 02:45:42PM -0500, Garry R. Osgood wrote:
How would the "pupus" functionality be directly exposed to users? The
answer is that it most assuredly WOULD NOT. I do not advocate, in fact
I ABHOR the idea that the user should end up drawing a little tree
Tino Schwarze wrote:
I recommend looking into David Hodson's Gimpeon at
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~hodsond/gimpeon.html
he's already figured out how to abstract such a system and I guess we
could get at least some nice ideas from his work.
Just remember that Gimpeon is intended for
Hi.
This also includes "The Future of Gimp" commentary.
Tino Schwarze wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 11:15:17PM +, Adam D. Moss wrote:
How would the "pupus" functionality be directly exposed to users? The
answer is that it most assuredly WOULD NOT. I do not advocate,
[lots of interesting stuff and ASCII art not quoted]
Does this mean we can do something like xRes, ie. process first a
`preview' in low-res (to show to the user) and then, as an idle task (or
possibly even scheduled for later work, do the full-res version?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage:
Hi Adam,
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 11:15:17PM +, Adam D. Moss wrote:
How would the "pupus" functionality be directly exposed to users? The
answer is that it most assuredly WOULD NOT. I do not advocate, in fact
I ABHOR the idea that the user should end up drawing a little tree
of boxes
Hi, all.
I want it! Hey, this is interactive Script-Fu! There should definitely
be an option to view and manipluate the trees. The possibilities are
endless. (e.g.: change a Dynamic Text and have changes propagate
automatically; very nice for batch jobs - perform task once, launch
"Adam D. Moss" wrote:
The somewhat-simplified idea common to both proposals is that a
list/tree of little black boxes is set up, where images get
fed into the tree at the bottom, get chewed up by the black boxes
through which they are sequentially sent, and at the end of
the line comes a
Right. If anyone knows or remembers who I am, they might
wonder what I've been up to for the past six months
since GimpCon 2000. =) If so, thanks for caring -- sit
back and I'll tell you!
Primarily, I'll admit, I've been busy with my super-mundane
day job, and diffused much of my remaining
That sounds good, very good. Does that mean that I will get my layer
tree instead of layer stack as well? (from your mail I gather that it's
possible but depends on the UI implementation). Being a programmer I
wouldn't object to the connect-boxes-with-lines model, perhaps it should
still be a
