> > Linear, Log, and sqrt are all common ways to scale histograms for
display.
> > Perhaps we should make it an option in preferences (or in the histogram
> > display itself).
>
> sqrt() - I haddn't thought of that. That sounds plausibly like what
> Photoshop is using. I might have a play with
On Monday, 5 Feb 2001, Jay Cox wrote:
> Linear, Log, and sqrt are all common ways to scale histograms for display.
> Perhaps we should make it an option in preferences (or in the histogram
> display itself).
sqrt() - I haddn't thought of that. That sounds plausibly like what
Photoshop is using
Austin Donnelly wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 4 Feb 2001, Roel Schroeven wrote:
>
> > I noticed in the source code that the histogram widget uses a logarithmic
> > scaling. Is there a reason to do it that way, as Photoshop et al. seem to
> > use a linear scaling.
>
> I just checked the CVS history; we'
On Sunday, 4 Feb 2001, Roel Schroeven wrote:
> I noticed in the source code that the histogram widget uses a logarithmic
> scaling. Is there a reason to do it that way, as Photoshop et al. seem to
> use a linear scaling.
I just checked the CVS history; we've been using a log y axis (ie
pixel cou