Re: Thing for Tips and Re: [new stuff for gimprc]

2000-04-17 Thread Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero
>I am currently taking care of the tips. I will add one about the >number of undo levels. Thanks for the suggestion. I also take this >opportunity to thank those who have already e-mailed me some new tips. >Keep them coming! Do you have a web site with current ones (I mean accepted, not distri

Re: Thing for Tips and Re: [new stuff for gimprc]

2000-04-17 Thread Raphael Quinet
On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero) wrote: [...] > > Regarding what Sven said about this taking too much memory, i think > > that there are _a lot_ more users using the Gimp for small images > > (like web things etc.), and so perhaps Gimp should be tailore

Thing for Tips and Re: [new stuff for gimprc]

2000-04-15 Thread Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero
>> Some other, nice (imo), proposed changes to gimprc: > >>(undo-levels 15) >>note that the undo-levels is set much lower than what I have it, but 5 >>just seems... well.. quite small.) >I think 5 is too small and 15 too high. How about 10? It depends what kind of images and computer you work wit

Re: [new stuff for gimprc]

2000-04-15 Thread Piers Cornwell
Hi, > Some other, nice (imo), proposed changes to gimprc: >(undo-levels 15) >note that the undo-levels is set much lower than what I have it, but 5 >just seems... well.. quite small.) I think 5 is too small and 15 too high. How about 10? Regarding what Sven said about this taking too much me

Re: new stuff for gimprc

2000-04-14 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, > Another idea might be some more questions when you first install. You should probably update your gimp, delete your .gimp-1.1 directory and try the new user installation... Salut, Sven

Re: new stuff for gimprc

2000-04-13 Thread Arcterex
On 13-Apr-2000 Sven Neumann wrote: [many snips] >> (undo-levels 15) > > The current number of undo-levels is fine, IMHO. At least the 15 you proposed > are a bit too large. Might go well for web-designers (small images) with a > large tile-cache, but... > > Let's see what other people have to

Re: new stuff for gimprc

2000-04-13 Thread Michael Natterer
Sven Neumann wrote: > > We will have to hardcode this into the session managment as there is no > sessionrc distributed with the gimp. I'll add some code that opens those > dialogs if no sessionrc is found. Hmmm, I vaguely remember that exactly > this has already been done, but appearantly it doe

Re: new stuff for gimprc

2000-04-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, > I propose that we make a few changes to the default gimprc (either the > system-wide or user one, whichever the options fit best). The changes should be done in app/gimprc.c. The systemwide gimprc should be changed too to reflect those changes. > The main thing is that session management

new stuff for gimprc

2000-04-12 Thread Garrett LeSage
I propose that we make a few changes to the default gimprc (either the system-wide or user one, whichever the options fit best). The main thing is that session management should be turned ON, and there should be a default session w/ the toolbox, layers, option, and brushes dialogs (...and possibl