We know. It's OK.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Coby Ricketts wrote:
> People are selling gimp on ebay I just thought you should know this.
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gim
People are selling gimp on ebay I just thought you should know this.
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 10:09 -0800, Patrick Horgan wrote:
> I hope that we do continue with smart funny developer splashes even if
> they offend some. I would be sad to find that the overly politically
> correct (imho) would be the ones that set the bar so low for the rest of
> us. It's a part of
Hi Aleksandar,
Am 10.11.2011 07:34, schrieb Aleksandar Kovac:
[..] I have noticed last year, as a part of a research, that
among the users, there are GIMP 'monks' way up 'above' who seem to know
every trick and loophole there is. Then, there are those brave initiates
who try enthusiastically. Ma
On 11/10/2011 12:39 AM, Alexia Death wrote:
> ... elision by patrick ...
>
> Aside all that, by personal firm belief is that we get trolled over
> the name and other things so much that occasionally trolling back is
> mandatory for sanity ;) I know Martin disagrees ;)
Thank you. Please carry on.
I hope that we do continue with smart funny developer splashes even if
they offend some. I would be sad to find that the overly politically
correct (imho) would be the ones that set the bar so low for the rest of
us. It's a part of open source to make jokes like that. It always
has. Smart peopl
> "The more people that use the latest GIMP code from git the better. It keeps
> the required effort to contribute code upstreams small, which in turn
> increases the likelihood of upstream contributions, and it makes bugs more
> vulnerable to early discovery which minimizes their impact."
I guess
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:05 PM, phanisvara das wrote:
> martin nordholts, in a blog post from 2009 (
> http://www.chromecode.com/2009/12/best-way-to-keep-up-with-gimp-from-git_26.html
> ) :
>
> "The more people that use the latest GIMP code from git the better. It keeps
> the required effort to c
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:19:00 +0530, Jeremy Morton
wrote:
They are NOT SUPPOSED TO do exactly that! Ever! They may want to, but
its not a good idea from anybody's perceptive. Development versions
may for example write incompatible or corrupt files may have features
that will not be in the fina
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Jeremy Morton wrote:
> Well if you want advanced users to use final releases, perhaps release them
> more often than once every 2 years? ;-)
We are aspiring to do exactly that and move to git is guite good at
supporting that ;)
--
--Alexia
_
On 10/11/2011 13:45, Alexia Death wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Jeremy Morton wrote:
On 10/11/2011 12:47, Rob Antonishen wrote:
The same could be said for any complex piece of software. I would
disagree that there are many "middle ground users" anymore - and they
shouldn't be a a t
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Aleksandar Kovac wrote:
> No, I really think 'a general user won't see it' is a lame excuse. It would
> make many people happy, me especially, and make the world a nicer place, if
> only someone could come up with a solid working definition of 'a general
> user' so
On 11-11-10 21:47 , Rob Antonishen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Aleksandar Kovac wrote:
The same could be said for any complex piece of software. I would
disagree that there are many "middle ground users" anymore - and they
shouldn't be a a target audience.
I agree, they should no
On 11-11-10 18:51 , Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Using development versions causes cancer, brings 20 year of
unluck on your family and kills kittens by thousands. People wo use
graphics software professionally tend to use apps that produce
_repeatedly_ consistent output. No dev version _ever_ guar
On 10/11/2011 12:47, Rob Antonishen wrote:
The same could be said for any complex piece of software. I would
disagree that there are many "middle ground users" anymore - and they
shouldn't be a a target audience.
So take the power users then. They might want to use a recent
development versi
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Aleksandar Kovac wrote:
>
> The baddies: And somehow, to an uninitiated, GIMP often comes across as a
> baffling mess. I have noticed last year, as a part of a research, that
> among the users, there are GIMP 'monks' way up 'above' who seem to know
> every trick a
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Jeremy Morton wrote:
> Speaking of 2.6 being old, how accurate is this tasktaste graph?
> http://tasktaste.com/projects/Enselic/gimp-2-8
Martin updated it last week, so it's pretty accurate. Up to a point :)
> It would seem to suggest there are maybe 1-2 weeks of
On 10/11/2011 09:51, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Aleksandar Kovac wrote:
"It's only a dev version, general users won't see it." is a lame excuse on
many levels. Is there 'us' and 'them' in open source?
Come on, you are smarter than that. Of course there is "u
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Alexia Death wrote:
> Cinepaint hasn't made releases in years (and two of the last releases
> don't even have source code tarballs) despite of endless promises. The
> only thing that is alive is Kai-Uw
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Alexia Death wrote:
> There's also cinepaint that was geared for movie world and the painter
> fork that seems to be maintained rather sanely as a set of patches on
> vanilla gimp. There's a few things that Id like to merge from there,
> but it's a bit tricky and w
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:21:16 +0530, Alexandre Prokoudine
wrote:
Using development versions causes cancer, brings 20 year of
unluck on your family and kills kittens by thousands. People wo use
graphics software professionally tend to use apps that produce
_repeatedly_ consistent output.
in
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
wrote:
>> …or get a fork and… ;)
>
> ...a knife and have a good meal.
>
> The only fork of GIMP that really survived is Seashore. It's targeted
> at an essentially different group of users.
There's also cinepaint that was geared for movie wor
W dniu 11-11-10 11:07, Alexandre Prokoudine pisze:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Bogdan Szczurek wrote:
-- cut --
Offended by the splash screen? Draw a better one.
Want GIMP to be better recognized? Start producing awesome art with it.
Sorry to see lack of hi-end features? Get involved with
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Bogdan Szczurek wrote:
> -- cut --
>
>> Offended by the splash screen? Draw a better one.
>> Want GIMP to be better recognized? Start producing awesome art with it.
>> Sorry to see lack of hi-end features? Get involved with development.
>
> -- cut --
>
> …or get a f
-- cut --
Offended by the splash screen? Draw a better one.
Want GIMP to be better recognized? Start producing awesome art with it.
Sorry to see lack of hi-end features? Get involved with development.
-- cut --
…or get a fork and… ;)
Bless
TB
___
g
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Aleksandar Kovac wrote:
> "It's only a dev version, general users won't see it." is a lame excuse on
> many levels. Is there 'us' and 'them' in open source?
Come on, you are smarter than that. Of course there is "us" and
"them". Using development versions causes
Hi all!
I drew the cage splash:P I drew it because some people were just not
getting the clue about us not changing the name and well, the cage
tool got merged. Synergy.
Quote:
"It's only a dev version, general users won't see it." is a lame
excuse on many levels. Is there 'us' and 'them' in ope
27 matches
Mail list logo
