W dniu 12-01-31 15:48, gespert...@gmail.com pisze:
2012/1/31 Bogdan Szczurek mailto:thebod...@gmail.com>>
I agree that having more precision is more favourable
mathematically. But is it so "visually"? I mean we'd have more
precisely determined color components but will it really "sho
2012/1/31 Bogdan Szczurek
> I agree that having more precision is more favourable mathematically. But
> is it so "visually"? I mean we'd have more precisely determined color
> components but will it really "show"? And if it will, then how much? Just a
> couple of questions, that, I believe, can't
> Am Dienstag, 31. Januar 2012 schrub Bogdan Szczurek:
>
> [...]
>
>> non-square pixels
>
> GIMP has that for ages.
Still, besides information about "uneven" horizontal and vertical
resolutions not stored within image itself. So designer have to
remember his image has non-square pixels and to
Am Dienstag, 31. Januar 2012 schrub Bogdan Szczurek:
[...]
> non-square pixels
GIMP has that for ages.
[...]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
http:
12-01-31 07:18, Martin Nordholts:
2012/1/30 Nathan Summers:
Big images require lots of ram, but in my mind a high-quality photo
editing program doesn't limit the size of how big an image you can
edit with it to much smaller than how much you would normally be able
to fit into ram.
Absolutely,
