On the thread-which-shall-be-nameless, when folks were asking for
a way to quit GIMP without being prompted to save files that had
already been exported, Alexia wrote:
> Oh, let me throw up this idea for you - you do not need a fork, just
> a script to override the default close... Very easy to in
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Kamilla Elliott
wrote:
> But when I exported it to pdf, it was teeny tiny--about 2 inches by 1 inch
> instead of 11 x 6 inches.
As others have mentioned, check your print size.
If all else fails, export it as PNG or TIFF, create a new document in
Scribus, import
On Sat, 2012-11-17 at 12:59 -0800, Kamilla Elliott wrote:
> when I exported it to pdf, it was teeny tiny--about 2 inches by 1 inch
Check that "File->Print Size" is plausible. It might be that it's using
the size from one of the images you pasted.
Always work at either the final resolution or (muc
On 11/17/2012 12:59 PM, Kamilla Elliott wrote:
Thanks again for your response. Sorry to be unclear. I first made the xcf at
100 ppi, importing photos and adding text; then when I had trouble exporting
it to pdf (the photos were too blurry), I re-created it from scratch, setting
it at 300ppi usi
Thanks again for your response. Sorry to be unclear. I first made the xcf at
100 ppi, importing photos and adding text; then when I had trouble exporting it
to pdf (the photos were too blurry), I re-created it from scratch, setting it
at 300ppi using Advanced Options under 'New File'. But when I
On 11/17/2012 08:38 AM, Liam R E Quin wrote:
>GIMP's focus is on artistic needs. Whether a blend mode is useful or not,
>can only a judged from an artistical point of view. If you want to model
>physical reality with GIMP means, be careful to check whether the actually
>implemented math is suitab
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Kamilla Elliott
wrote:
> Thank you so much for the speedy reply. That does improve the res and sorts
> out the font problems totally. It's still not printer ready--the photos,
> which are very high res when I import them, remain a bit too soft and
> blurry. I have
On Sat, 2012-11-17 at 13:57 +0100, yahvuu wrote:
[...]
> GIMP's focus is on artistic needs. Whether a blend mode is useful or not,
> can only a judged from an artistical point of view. If you want to model
> physical reality with GIMP means, be careful to check whether the actually
> implemented ma
Hi Elle,
Am 16.11.2012 20:33, schrieb Elle Stone:
> An implicit assumption seems to be that linear light blending is
> *always* more correct than blending in the regular sRGB color space.
> While Normal blending requires linear light to be radiometrically
> correct (to work like real light works),
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:30 PM, yahvuu wrote:
> Am 14.11.2012 19:00, schrieb Guillermo Espertino (Gez):
>> b) support applications that still use blending in non-linear space. Web
>> browsers, for instance.
>
> how much support for 'web type' blending modes does GIMP really need?
>
> GIMP is not
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Elle Stone wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A couple different lines of discussion are in this thread, the correct
> way to implement Overlay in regular sRGB, the effect of linear gamma
> blending with respect to changing w3 standards, how to deal with
> legacy blend modes aft
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Graeme Gill wrote:
> And loss prevention has little or nothing to do with the decision
> to save or export. If you track what features an image uses, then
> you can by default save back to the file format used to open
> the image. Only if some processing operation
12 matches
Mail list logo
