Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> As a free software developer yourself surely you don't do everything
> people tell you to.
No, but I find rather a lot of time, if someone (never mind
a whole bunch of people!) is bothered enough to post a comment
to my mailing list, that they have a point worth unde
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 06:13:05 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Robert Krawitz wrote:
>
>> All right, let's stop this nonsense.
>
> After reading that I honestly expected that it's going to end at...
>
>> You have every right to do what you please with GIMP.
>
> B
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Robert Krawitz wrote:
> All right, let's stop this nonsense.
After reading that I honestly expected that it's going to end at...
> You have every right to do what you please with GIMP.
But no, it hasn't :)
> You've gone out of your way to try to force everyone.
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 05:30:35 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Monty Montgomery wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
>>> Democracy is overrated :)
>>
>> Agreed. But despots get their feedback primarily through overripe
>> fruit... and
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Monty Montgomery wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
>> Democracy is overrated :)
>
> Agreed. But despots get their feedback primarily through overripe
> fruit... and revolutions.
Revolutions? :D
So far it looks rather like "I'm going t
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
> Democracy is overrated :)
Agreed. But despots get their feedback primarily through overripe
fruit... and revolutions.
The save/export decision is boneheaded, stubborn, condescending, and
obviously wrong. Not in concept, but in implementatio
> Could you please for the love of any deity stop overreacting
> As a free software developer yourself surely you don't do everything
> people tell you to.
Connect the two. So, "no".
This change pisses me off quite a lot as a day to day user. It's not
overreacting to say so. I realize the dev
As mitch and I discussed on irc, as the plan stands right now, the
GIMP won't have any working color profile.
Going forward, AFAIK, the "image->mode->assign/convert color profile"
menu entries should be removed from the lcms plugin, and everything
automatically converted to srgb/R'G'B' on import.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Nicolas Robidoux
wrote:
> It is my opinion that XYZ is not fully replaced by infinite gamut linear RGB
> if only because XYZ has a channel which is a proper luminance channel. RGB
> does not.
>
> Enough to deserve a place within GIMP? Don't know. If my (initial) i
It is my opinion that XYZ is not fully replaced by infinite gamut linear
RGB if only because XYZ has a channel which is a proper luminance channel.
RGB does not.
Enough to deserve a place within GIMP? Don't know. If my (initial) inputs
and (final) outputs are sRGB, linear RGB with sRGB primaries i
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
>
>>> *I haven't yet added in code that handles Gimp's 16-bit floating point and
>>> 32-bit integer image types. Are these image types being used by anyone?
>>
>> 16bit integer can
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
>> *I haven't yet added in code that handles Gimp's 16-bit floating point and
>> 32-bit integer image types. Are these image types being used by anyone?
>
> 16bit integer can perhaps be useful for various scientific
> applications that GIMP thus
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Elle Stone wrote:
> I posted a list of proposed additions/enhancements to the lcms.c plugin and
> would like some feedback on what to start working on next
> (http://ninedegreesbelow.com/temp/gimp-lcms-8.html). For instance,
*snip*
> *I haven't yet added in code
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Elle Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Tobias Jakobs wrote:
>
> with all this changes and the recent work in git it looks very promising.
>> Thank you and every one from the Gimp Team who help for this work. Could
>> you perhaps give us short status
* Dima Ursu [11-28-12 11:23]:
> I have a little trouble with the mailing list: whenever I write a replay
> (pressing replay to list in thunderbird) I don't see after that my message
> in the thread: what is the matter?
gmail considers it a duplicate post since you posted it via gmail smtp and
hid
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012, 17:19:14, Dima Ursu wrote:
> I have a little trouble with the mailing list: whenever I write a replay
> (pressing replay to list in thunderbird) I don't see after that my
> message in the thread: what is the matter?
GMail - it hides your own messages.
--
< Jern
Hello!
I have a little trouble with the mailing list: whenever I write a replay
(pressing replay to list in thunderbird) I don't see after that my
message in the thread: what is the matter?
Cheers, Dima
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-deve
On 11/28/2012 05:12 PM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 06:51:56PM +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Monty Montgomery wrote:
So please, for the love of god, change the 'fuck you' dialog to
something that doesn't slap the user instead of doing w
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> Though a democratic process is no substitute for a scientific process
> (and maybe UI design is scientific, who knows?), in this case we must
> pay heed to our users.
Democracy is overrated :)
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicswor
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 06:51:56PM +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Monty Montgomery wrote:
>
> > So please, for the love of god, change the 'fuck you' dialog to
> > something that doesn't slap the user instead of doing what the user
> > wants, expects, and the
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Monty Montgomery wrote:
> So please, for the love of god, change the 'fuck you' dialog to
> something that doesn't slap the user instead of doing what the user
> wants, expects, and the code is perfectly capable of doing.
Could you please for the love of any deity
--- En date de : Mer 28.11.12, Monty Montgomery a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:32 AM,
> Alexia Death
> wrote:
> > ... sigh... Let me explain this again.
>
> Yes, we're all shaking our heads.
>
> (I was bitten by the smarmy 'you're wrong! I know what you
> want to do,
> but I'll not do
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Alexia Death wrote:
> ... sigh... Let me explain this again.
Yes, we're all shaking our heads.
(I was bitten by the smarmy 'you're wrong! I know what you want to do,
but I'll not do it!' dialog several times tonight alone... nothing
like re-navigating through st
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Tobias Jakobs wrote:
with all this changes and the recent work in git it looks very promising.
> Thank you and every one from the Gimp Team who help for this work. Could
> you perhaps give us short status update about what is now working and what
> is still missing
On 11/25/2012 04:59 AM, Cristian Secară wrote:
În data de Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:32:55 +0200, Alexia Death a scris:
[...] Save is "safe" and always keeps everthing you can see in GIMP
UI - you can continue editing from it. Export is always destructive.
No other format than XCF supports all gimp fe
> On 11/24/12, Elle Stone wrote:
>
> Turns out it wasn't the babl files after all, and it wasn't any Gimp
> code, either. I didn't write the gegl iterators correctly (thank you
> Mike Henning for writing the patch and showing how the iterators
> should be written!).
>
Hello Ellen,
with all this
26 matches
Mail list logo
