Re: [Gimp-developer] API to parse a saved GIMP's curves file

2013-09-27 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
(sorry if this appears twice, I only just subscribed) Kevin Payne payn...@hotmail.com writes: A couple of years ago I wrote a script-fu script to read curve files if that helps: http://www.gimptalk.com/index.php?/topic/50107-batch-edit-curves/ This works for the exports from GIMP, but GIMP

Re: [Gimp-developer] GSoC PSD Project Summary

2013-09-27 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:24 AM, CirqueForge wrote: Hello everyone. GSoC officially ended on Monday so I wanted to summarize the list of things that I was able to do during the project: 1.) Documentation was updated to reflect updated specifications from Adobe inside the plugin. 2.) Plugin

[Gimp-developer] wgo, model releases, and cc licensing

2013-09-27 Thread Pat David
All, I had an interesting discussion today in IRC I'm summarizing here in order to clarify some sticky points. I had recently pushed a new tutorial that included an image I took of a friend. Michael had concerns about the use of this image and the cc-by-sa license I was applying to the entire

Re: [Gimp-developer] wgo, model releases, and cc licensing

2013-09-27 Thread Partha Bagchi
Funny you should ask. :) Shutterbug has a recent article on this: http://www.shutterbug.com/content/copyrights-model-releases-and-contracts-what-every-photographer-should-know And you may want to look at what the American Society of Media Photographers has to say:

Re: [Gimp-developer] wgo, model releases, and cc licensing

2013-09-27 Thread Guillermo Espertino (Gez)
El 27/09/13 19:01, Pat David escribió: All, I had an interesting discussion today in IRC I'm summarizing here in order to clarify some sticky points. I had recently pushed a new tutorial that included an image I took of a friend. Michael had concerns about the use of this image and the

Re: [Gimp-developer] wgo, model releases, and cc licensing

2013-09-27 Thread Pat David
IANAL, but I think the rule of thumb for CC is that you should have all the requirements for a traditional copyright covered first. If you hold the copyright, then you're entitled to re-license your stuff with more permissive licenses like Creative Commons. This was my understanding also, the