I don't think it's fair to call that a consensus. We are currently at
a point where no one sees a sufficient reason to do it to overcome the
moral niggles about supporting another proprietary platform.
If someone was to figure out what exactly is required to distributed
via Steam and volunteer to
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Daniel Sabo wrote:
If someone was to figure out what exactly is required to distributed
via Steam and volunteer to get everything in order...
Which part of we have a contributor willing to maintain a build for
Steam, in my previous email do I need to clarify?
Which part of we have a contributor willing to maintain a build for
Steam, in my previous email do I need to clarify?
Levels of enthusiasm. If Michael wants to do it then there is not a
consensus stopping him from doing so; my interpretation of your email
was that he was only going to do it if
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Daniel Sabo wrote:
Which part of we have a contributor willing to maintain a build for
Steam, in my previous email do I need to clarify?
Levels of enthusiasm. If Michael wants to do it then there is not a
consensus stopping him from doing so; my interpretation
Sorry, the last time I heard about this before you posted this email
was you saying on IRC that drawoc had volunteered to do a build. I am
really not clear at this point why you posted a message saying we had
rejected the idea.
___
gimp-developer-list
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Daniel Sabo wrote:
Sorry, the last time I heard about this before you posted this email
was you saying on IRC that drawoc had volunteered to do a build. I am
really not clear at this point why you posted a message saying we had
rejected the idea.
OK, I
Alexandre Prokoudine (alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com) wrote:
Also, I don't understand neither why we are having this conversation,
nor where the word consensus came from. I implied no consensus.
You wrote the core team's opinion currently is, which implies that the
core team (whoever that
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Daniel Sabo wrote:
the core team's opinion currently is that supporting a proprietary software
delivery platform doesn't feel right.
I took from this that either drawoc didn't really want to do it or
someone else had explicitly asked him not to.
This was not
the core team's opinion currently is that supporting a proprietary software
delivery platform doesn't feel right.
I took from this that either drawoc didn't really want to do it or
someone else had explicitly asked him not to.
There are several people who have legitimate gripes we this idea
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
TL;DR: there is no consensus on Steam yet.
For myself, at least, that's promising. I was willing to drop the subject
entirely with no further discussion based on your feedback response. I
don't follow
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Sam Gleske sam.mxra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hopefully, others will add on to that pros/cons list so that core devs can
make an informed decision.
Speaking strictly as a reader of the mailing list, the GIMP project is
woefully understaffed. Putting GIMP into the
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Christopher Curtis ccurt...@gmail.comwrote:
Speaking strictly as a reader of the mailing list, the GIMP project is
woefully understaffed. Putting GIMP into the hands of tens of thousands of
users who are probably not on the primary platform (i.e. Linux) may
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Sam Gleske sam.mxra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Christopher Curtis ccurt...@gmail.comwrote:
Putting GIMP into the hands of tens of thousands of users
who are probably not on the primary platform (i.e. Linux) may siphon
off valuable
Sam Gleske (sam.mxra...@gmail.com) wrote:
I'm curious to hear Simon's opinions since he openly admitted he was one of
the against parties.
Ok, so let me detail some of my concerns. I want to have it clear
however, that this is not some sort of official statement from the
gimp team, this is just
On 03/06/2014 09:01 PM, Simon Budig wrote:
Secondly I believe that we have a certain responsibility towards the
privacy of our users. By using Steam we are encouraging people to create
an account there, provide download statistics as well as (to an unknown
extent) usage data. We let them
Ofnuts (ofn...@laposte.net) wrote:
Your reasoning seems to imply that Steam will become the sole source for
Gimp downloads, while as I understand it it will only be an additional
source. Making Gimp available on Steam would not be pushing people towards
Steam, it would make Gimp more easily
16 matches
Mail list logo
