Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gegl-developer] babl roadmap

2014-10-16 Thread Øyvind Kolås
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Jon Nordby wrote: > you are answering in detail 'how we will get "there"' but Elle (as I see it) > is asking more 'do you agree that we want to go "there"'. This leaves me > unsure if you are implicitly agreeing, if you disagree and have a different > "there" in m

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gegl-developer] babl roadmap

2014-10-16 Thread Jon Nordby
On 16 October 2014 21:37, Øyvind Kolås wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Elle Stone > wrote: > > On 10/15/2014 01:46 PM, Simon Budig wrote: > > If I understand them correctly, Michael Henning and Jon Norby are saying > > that the criteria is something along the lines of: "For RGB editing

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gegl-developer] babl roadmap

2014-10-16 Thread Øyvind Kolås
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Elle Stone wrote: > On 10/15/2014 01:46 PM, Simon Budig wrote: > If I understand them correctly, Michael Henning and Jon Norby are saying > that the criteria is something along the lines of: "For RGB editing > operations, use UserRGB primaries *unless* there's a re

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gegl-developer] babl roadmap

2014-10-16 Thread Elle Stone
On 10/15/2014 01:46 PM, Simon Budig wrote: Elle Stone (ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com) wrote: On 10/15/2014 08:30 AM, Øyvind Kolås wrote: On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Elle Stone When the user opens a color-managed fooRGB image, for which *specific* editing operations will the image be conv