C R (caj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> A pixel brush seems like an adequate replacement for that functionality.
Again, no.
Try working with a pixel brush in a bigger magnification and check how
the pixel-grid-snapping of the pencil tool makes a huge difference to
the paintbrush.
Bye,
Simon
--
A pixel brush seems like an adequate replacement for that functionality.
-C
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Ofnuts wrote:
> On 21/06/16 17:00, Americo Gobbo wrote:
>
>>
>> the Pencil tool is a classic.
>>
>
> A little-used classic. It has its uses (pixel art), but on the whole I
> have much mo
On 21/06/16 17:00, Americo Gobbo wrote:
the Pencil tool is a classic.
A little-used classic. It has its uses (pixel art), but on the whole I
have much more often redirected pencil users to the brush that the reverse.
___
gimp-developer-list mailing
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 08:57 +0100, C R wrote:
> That's fine, except then you lose a dedicated tool to switch back and
> forth from.
In particular, if you use a tablet you can have a "pencil" stylus and a
"paintbrush" stylus.
--
Liam R. E. Quin
___
gi
Thanks,
I don't have understood reading the documentation... is possible to note
that the tool pencil does more that hard-edge or not anti-aliasing.
On 21-06-2016 12:18, Simon Budig wrote:
The Tool Options of the Pencil and Paintbrush are identical... the unique
>difference is that Pencil do
Americo Gobbo (jag.rabi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> The Tool Options of the Pencil and Paintbrush are identical... the unique
> difference is that Pencil don't have antialiasing... so, hard edges.
Note that the pencil tool also avoid non-integer brush coordinates, i.e.
the brushes "snap" to whole pixel
Hi all,
The Tool Options of the Pencil and Paintbrush are identical... the
unique difference is that Pencil don't have antialiasing... so, hard edges.
This is the concept of Pencil tool... to have, a Paintbrush with a
hard-edge option is an option... but, if you can a tool with
hard-edge...
>
> While tossing around wild ideas, what about allowing people to add tool
> presets to their toolbox? That way you could have your pencil back by
> adding
> such a preset.
>
For the two tools in question, this feature already exists. It's called the
"Brushes" palate. ;)
-C
>
> Tobias
> _
On Tuesday 21 June 2016 13:17:59 Pat David wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:50 AM Ofnuts wrote:
> > Shouldn't we instead get rid of the pencil tool and add a
> > no-anti-aliasing option to the brush?
>
> This sounds like a great option. As CR says, if the only difference is
> that one paramete
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:50 AM Ofnuts wrote:
> Shouldn't we instead get rid of the pencil tool and add a
> no-anti-aliasing option to the brush?
>
This sounds like a great option. As CR says, if the only difference is
that one parameter, then it makes sense.
+1
--
Pat David
https://pixls.us
h
That's fine, except then you lose a dedicated tool to switch back and forth
from.
That said, I never ever have any use for the pencil tool. It would not make
me sad to see it go in favour of reducing number of tools.
It hardly seems worth having two tools that do the same thing apart from
one opti
Shouldn't we instead get rid of the pencil tool and add a
no-anti-aliasing option to the brush?
On 20/06/16 20:51, C R wrote:
Yep, may as well. lol
-C
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Andrew Pullins
wrote:
Sounds like a good idea
On Jun 15, 2016 10:51 PM, "Americo Gobbo" wrote:
Hi all,
T
12 matches
Mail list logo