> C R (caj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > A pixel brush seems like an adequate replacement for that functionality.
>
> Again, no.
>
> Try working with a pixel brush in a bigger magnification and check how
> the pixel-grid-snapping of the pencil tool makes a huge difference to
> the paintbrush.
If there'
C R (caj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > C R (caj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > A pixel brush seems like an adequate replacement for that functionality.
> >
> > Again, no.
> >
> > Try working with a pixel brush in a bigger magnification and check how
> > the pixel-grid-snapping of the pencil tool makes a hug
> Have you actually tried to do what I outlined above?
>
>
Have you? lol
No - I haven't. It's not currently possible to turn off anti-aliasing on
the brush tool, so it's not possible to "test" it.
However, knowing how anti-aliasing works, your statement is incorrect...
The paintbrush tool resample
C R (caj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Have you actually tried to do what I outlined above?
> >
> >
> Have you? lol
> No - I haven't. It's not currently possible to turn off anti-aliasing on
> the brush tool, so it's not possible to "test" it.
Ah, sorry. I missed that we're discussing hypothetical futu
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Ofnuts wrote:
>>
>> the Pencil tool is a classic.
>
> A little-used classic. It has its uses (pixel art), but on the whole I have
> much more often redirected pencil users to the brush that the reverse.
...so that they would not be able to draw pixel-perfect recta
To make things even more complicated, the new MyPaint brushes can have a
pixel brush that behaves like pencil.
So if we get brush option to turn anti-aliasing off, we'll have 3 tools
to make pixel art with..
-Petteri
On 22.6.2016 13:40, Simon Budig wrote:
C R (caj...@gmail.com) wrote:
Have
>
>
> Ah, sorry. I missed that we're discussing hypothetical future
> characteristics of the tools here. I was just looking at the current
> difference between the pencil and the paintbrush tool.
>
Yes, it saves time if everyone reads the entire thread before commenting.
I'm guilty of this too som
> So if we get brush option to turn anti-aliasing off, we'll have 3 tools to
> make pixel art with..
Hahaha! What do you want to bet it probably works /slightly/ different than
either results from no anti-aliasing on brush, or the how the Pencil tool
works.
smh. ;) Obviously we have some things
On June 22, 2016 1:07:35 PM GMT+02:00, Alexandre Prokoudine
wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Ofnuts wrote:
>>>
>>> the Pencil tool is a classic.
>>
>> A little-used classic. It has its uses (pixel art), but on the whole
>I have
>> much more often redirected pencil users to the brush th
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:37 PM, C R wrote:
> I still recommend adding the no anti-aliasing option to the brush though
That would involve somehow making GIMP to switch presets when swapping
Wacom pens, for starters. As Liam pointed out before.
Alex
___
>
> > I still recommend adding the no anti-aliasing option to the brush though
>
> That would involve somehow making GIMP to switch presets when swapping
> Wacom pens, for starters. As Liam pointed out before.
>
Why would pen presets be affected?
Also, we could just have the checkbox switch to th
Ah, I think I see.
The presets could be stored as they are now, and the tool simply switched
with the checkmark.
We could also think about storing presets via brush instead of via tool.
That would be much more useful, imho.
-C
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:44 PM, C R wrote:
> > I still recommend a
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:44 PM, C R wrote:
>> > I still recommend adding the no anti-aliasing option to the brush though
>>
>> That would involve somehow making GIMP to switch presets when swapping
>> Wacom pens, for starters. As Liam pointed out before.
>
>
>
> Why would pen presets be affected?
I did, I just misunderstood. :) I also replied about it too with a
possibly better solution to brush presets problems.
-C
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:44 PM, C R wrote:
> >> > I still recommend adding
C R (caj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Yes, it saves time if everyone reads the entire thread before commenting.
> I'm guilty of this too sometimes, though, so don't worry about it. :)
You know, I actually reread, and I find the thread highly confusing.
It starts with the hardness-parameter in the penci
>
> You know, I actually reread, and I find the thread highly confusing.
>
I'll try to help explain, if it's not going to upset you...
> It starts with the hardness-parameter in the pencil tool, then goes on
> to how paintbrush is so similiar to the pencil tool, how the pencil tool
> can get rem
On 06/22/2016 09:33 AM, C R wrote:
Which I have explained 5 times now that this is only if it includes the
(topic of this thread) proposed no anti-aliasing checkbox.
On 06/15/2016 10:51 PM, Americo Gobbo wrote:
Hi all,
The Hardness parameter to Pencil Tool is not utilized, but is present
in it
Hi Elle. :) Thanks for your input...
> I think Americo's suggestion (original topic of thread) was that the
> Hardness slider be removed from the list of options for the Pencil, simply
> because this slider doesn't seem to affect the actual paint applied using
> the Pencil.
>
Yes. I think we all
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:55 PM, C R wrote:
> Speaking as a digital painter (samples available upon request), I can tell
> you the Pencil tool does not replace a pencil brush. In fact, the pencil
> tool acts nothing like a pencil at all. :) Could re-name it the
> "pixel-tool" but it absolutely
On 06/22/2016 11:19 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:55 PM, C R wrote:
>Speaking as a digital painter (samples available upon request), I can tell
>you the Pencil tool does not replace a pencil brush. In fact, the pencil
>tool acts nothing like a pencil at all.:) Could
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>> Speaking as a digital painter (samples available upon request), I can tell
>> you the Pencil tool does not replace a pencil brush. In fact, the pencil
>> tool acts nothing like a pencil at all. :) Could re-name it the
>> "pixel-tool".
On 06/22/2016 12:16 PM, Elle Stone wrote:
I rather suspect you might be right, that for many use cases the Brush
tool is better for use as a "digital pencil".
Athough experimenting, really the Pencil tool sometimes is nicer than
the Brush tool for making sketch-type marks. Can you specify
whe
>
> > Speaking as a digital painter (samples available upon request), I can
> tell
> > you the Pencil tool does not replace a pencil brush. In fact, the pencil
> > tool acts nothing like a pencil at all. :) Could re-name it the
> > "pixel-tool" but it absolutely sucks at being a pencil in just
On Wednesday 22 June 2016 18:28:45 C R wrote:
[...]
> Already answered this before. "We" is the community. The community is made
> of everyone involved in the GIMP project who can act to improve it. So if
> we as a community decide it's worth changing, then we can change it. I
> mean, that's usua
I admit that I don't care at all who "we" includes. Substitute with
"interested parties". I'm well aware that even great ideas might never get
priority. There are no promises, no guarantees. Right now "we" includes
just who is here. If we are not allowed to discuss what we, might do or
might want t
As for the "we"
Le 22/06/2016 22:48, C R a écrit :
I admit that I don't care at all who "we" includes. Substitute with
"interested parties". I'm well aware that even great ideas might never get
priority. There are no promises, no guarantees. Right now "we" includes
just who is here. If we are not
So when I say "we can do this", I should say "I can do this"?
I do wonder if people actually read what I post. :)
-C
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 6:34 AM, JLuc wrote:
> As for the "we"
> Le 22/06/2016 22:48, C R a écrit :
>
>> I admit that I don't care at all who "we" includes. Substitute with
>> "
In the interests of moving on with more important things than the symantics
of "we", I can attempt to extract the team aspect from my verbiage.
I can say for example: "It can be done this way." or "It might be decided
that."
It sounds cold, and impersonal to me, but if it allows us to move forward
28 matches
Mail list logo
