not allow it to stay at zero, and when it's zero, just add a border
whose color is identical to the specified base color? This would allow
the 'add border' filter to add plain un-beveled borders if the user desires.
--
Best re
layer effects almost immediately every time you make a change. It
wouldn't be worth it if you had to wait 10 seconds every time.
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
On 09/09/2012 20:10, yahvuu wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
Am 09.09.2012 13:32, schrieb Jeremy Morton:
On 09/09/2012 12:24, yahvuu wr
se them to select any path nodes that fall within the boundary?
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
On 09/09/2012 12:24, yahvuu wrote:
Am 08.09.2012 20:02, schrieb Jeremy Morton:
[..] What's taking up the time is going through the following process:
1. Delete previous applied "effects layers".
2. Modify path.
3. Convert path to selection.
4. Fill selection with colour.
5. App
cally.
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
On 08/09/2012 20:08, Liam R E Quin wrote:
On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 11:34 +0100, Jeremy Morton wrote:
Are there any plans to introduce something like
this for GIMP?
The GIMP plans are limited by having very few active programmers.
Are you volunteering to work
the above steps would change to the following:
1. Modify path.
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
in GIMP, you have to do it all manually (create
path, convert to selection, fill selection) so it's much slower and it
isn't a "live preview". Are there any plans to introduce something like
this for GIMP?
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
__
refuse to install on SP2, and at most should popup
a 'not supported' warning. It's pointless to put a barricade in place
because of a registry entry.
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
On 07/05/2012 18:27, Jernej Simončič wrote:
On Monday, May 7, 2012, 15:45:13, Jeremy Morton wr
On 07/05/2012 18:27, Jernej Simončič wrote:
On Monday, May 7, 2012, 15:45:13, Jeremy Morton wrote:
The "GTK+ and GIMP installers for Windows" project is listed as
GPL-licensed on Sourceforge, but I can't seem to find the source files
used to make the latest GIMP-2.8 instal
p ISS script is?
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
On 06/05/2012 17:39, Jernej Simončič wrote:
On Sunday, May 6, 2012, 17:39:25, Jay Smith wrote:
Is SP3 _really_ necessary?
Probably not, but I have no time to test on unsupported OS versions.
There are many XP users who will not go past SP2
;bumping the minimum requirement' down again.
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
On 07/05/2012 08:07, Cristian Secară wrote:
În data de Mon, 07 May 2012 00:02:43 +0100, Jeremy Morton a scris:
Please please please offer support for SP2. It's not hard and
there's still a ton of S
Please please please offer support for SP2. It's not hard and there's
still a ton of SP2 installations out there. If you don't bother with
SP2, you might as well not bother with XP at all.
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
On 06/05/2012 20:06, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
GIM
Jernej,
I run XP SP2 on some machines. My vote is also to support SP2. Why is
SP2 unsupported, can't you fire up a VM with it on or something? At
least provide 2 separate installers, with SP2 and SP3 requirements...
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
On 06/05/2012 17:39, J
Alexandre, your social skills get me through the day sometimes.
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
On 06/05/2012 15:26, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:15 PM, legion1978 wrote:
Please read it before you ditch it.
"I know you are tired of the "rename GIMP&quo
Now that GIMP 2.8 is officially out, shouldn't we (with some urgency)
get an official Windows installer for it near the top of the downloads page:
http://www.gimp.org/downloads/
We still have the 2.6.12 installer linked.
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton
On 17/04/2012 15:13, John Harris wrote:
V e r s i o n
Two Point Eight.
This could still fit in the bottom of your vertical banner as your
third element, yet it would minimize the visual weight.
Please god no. That sounds seriously cheesy. :-)
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez
This may not be the appropriate place for this, but...
WOOHOO!!!
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
On 05/04/2012 21:48, Michael Natterer wrote:
Hi,
GIMP 2.8.0-RC1 has been released. This is the first release candidate
of the upcoming stable 2.8 release.
Running this release for the
Thumbs up from me! I think 2.7 was good enough, with a few code
cleanups, to be released as 2.8 half a year ago!
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
On 08/03/2012 17:58, Nils Philippsen wrote:
Hi there,
I guess I've been a monumental pain to some in the past weeks with all
my nagging
With all due respect, your method of not paying anyone has resulted in 2
years without a stable release of GIMP. What's your point? It's not
like things are just rosy and there aint nothing to fix.
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
On 05/03/2012 11:56, peter sikking wrote:
P
s on a whole image. Push is, well,
similar to smudge - you drag the cursor around to manipulate the image.
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
On 02/03/2012 23:01, Przemyslaw Golab wrote:
2012/3/2 Jeremy Morton mailto:ad...@game-point.net>>
Does GIMP have an equivalent to
Does GIMP have an equivalent to Paint Shop Pro's retouch 'push' tool?
It's similar to but not the same as the smudge tool.
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
h
ar we are to a 2.8
release? I'm really looking forward to it!!!
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
Oh god, we're really in trouble. :-S Yahoo! Answers is laughing at us?
I learnt where babby formed from that informative site.
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
On 24/11/2011 09:20, Jim Michaels wrote:
the comments I am getting from some yahoo answers when GIMP is suggeste
On 10/11/2011 13:45, Alexia Death wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Jeremy Morton wrote:
On 10/11/2011 12:47, Rob Antonishen wrote:
The same could be said for any complex piece of software. I would
disagree that there are many "middle ground users" anymore - and they
should
nt
development version at work... still worth having a professional looking
product.
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
ven for development versions.
Speaking of 2.6 being old, how accurate is this tasktaste graph?
http://tasktaste.com/projects/Enselic/gimp-2-8
It would seem to suggest there are maybe 1-2 weeks of work left but I
get the feeling there is more than that. :-)
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
26 matches
Mail list logo
