Hi,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Elle Stone
wrote:
> On 11/13/2014 09:51 AM, Jehan Pagès wrote:
>>>
>>> I take it as given that Pat, Jehan, and myself will do the actual work of
>>> assembling the images, yes? And all three of us will also contribute test
>>> images. We each have websites so
On 11/13/2014 09:51 AM, Jehan Pagès wrote:
I take it as given that Pat, Jehan, and myself will do the actual work of
assembling the images, yes? And all three of us will also contribute test
images. We each have websites so we can put up pages with thumbnails of
suggested test images for consider
On 11/13/2014 10:02 AM, Simon Budig wrote:
I do have access to a x-rite color checker which should be in a
reasonably good condition (it is slightly older but has been stored in
the dark).
I could try to set up a colorful scene and shoot it in RAW with my
Nikon D40. Would this be of any help?
On 11/11/14 17:32, Chris Mohler wrote:
> The 2002 version contains a *wide* variety of things that can go
> spectacularly wrong when printing (eg for one, over saturation of
> black completely destroys the image of the watch), and was a real life
> saver when I was setting up the workflow of: Work
Jehan Pagès (jehan.marmott...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Well for the "contribute test images" part, I'm not a photographer. I
> have a good enough Canon camera and I can try to shoot some objects
> with RAW on request though, but I won't guarantee the art quality for
> these. Though you'll say that's not
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Elle Stone
wrote:
> On 11/12/2014 08:32 PM, Pat David wrote:
>>
>> Jehan,
>>
>> Ah, I did mean to link something, but thank you for linking my Flickr
>> account. Note that for the most part, I have the RAW files from any of my
>> photos that I'd be happy to r
On 11/13/2014 09:23 AM, Jehan Pagès wrote:
Otherwise I don't think we are in a hurry, and the set can also be
gathered slowly with time and patience
+1
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership:
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:32 AM, Pat David wrote:
> Jehan,
>
> Ah, I did mean to link something, but thank you for linking my Flickr
> account. Note that for the most part, I have the RAW files from any of my
> photos that I'd be happy to release for whatever purposes are needed.
>
> I also
On 11/12/2014 08:32 PM, Pat David wrote:
Jehan,
Ah, I did mean to link something, but thank you for linking my Flickr
account. Note that for the most part, I have the RAW files from any of my
photos that I'd be happy to release for whatever purposes are needed.
I also have model releases for a
Jehan,
Ah, I did mean to link something, but thank you for linking my Flickr
account. Note that for the most part, I have the RAW files from any of my
photos that I'd be happy to release for whatever purposes are needed.
I also have model releases for all of my images as well, and can include
th
On 11/11/2014 07:32 PM, Chris Mohler wrote:
The license wording is a little ambiguous, but I interpret it to mean
that it's OK to use it for testing purposes, as long as you aren't
selling or otherwise distributing the image itself. I'm not sure how
that would relate to a project like GIMP, and
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Elle Stone
wrote:
> *What copyrighted or otherwise test images GIMP users might have downloaded
> from the internet and found useful, and
> *what kinds of test images GIMP users might have already put together,
> *for what particular testing purposes.
I have used
Here are links to some sample collections of copyrighted test images:
http://www.pcstats.com/articleimages/200601/samsungspp2040_300dpi1.jpg
http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/article_pages/test_images.html
http://www.outbackphoto.com/printinginsights/pi048/essay.html
So the first question is:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Pat David wrote:
> I can't add much to the color discussion, but at least I can offer up just
> about any of my images as RAW for any testing (just about everything I
> shoot is cc-by-sa usually). If anyone finds one of mine they would like,
> just let me kno
I can't add much to the color discussion, but at least I can offer up just
about any of my images as RAW for any testing (just about everything I
shoot is cc-by-sa usually). If anyone finds one of mine they would like,
just let me know and I'd be happy to provide the camera raw file.
On Fri, Nov
On 11/07/2014 10:25 AM, Jehan Pagès wrote:
>A good test suite of "copyleft" images would be a nice thing to have,
>whether for testing new and existing editing algorithms, or for whatever
>testing that individual GIMP users might want to do on their own
>(printer-related, for example).
That's a
I suggested
http://www.imagemagick.org/download/image-bank/16bit840x840images/README to
Elle.
Some details RE: how they were made are found in individual .txt files,
e.g.
http://www.imagemagick.org/download/image-bank/16bit840x840images/wave.txt
___
gimp
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Elle Stone
wrote:
> On 11/06/2014 11:24 AM, Gary Aitken wrote:
>>
>> Even if the result is not obvious visually, I need a heads-up
>> so I can pay close attention to what's happening and undo the
>> operation if appropriate.
>
>
> On 11/07/2014 04:25 AM, Simos
18 matches
Mail list logo