Jason Simanek (jsima...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Sun 28 Oct 2012 08:04:08 AM CDT, Bot Obi wrote:
> >For me the super-duper solution was to have two configurable zoom
> >steps in the presets: 1) a "fine zoom" step and 2) a "standard zoom"
> >step.
[...]
> The trick of course to changing something like
Adding a new "custom zoom" mode with adjustable zoom steps in the presets
wouldn't remove anything that anybody got used to.
I don't think the programmatic complexity would increase dramatically as
everything that's needed for the feature is already implemented (already by
now the zoom level can be
On Sun 28 Oct 2012 08:04:08 AM CDT, Bot Obi wrote:
IMHO they could easily be as small as one
hundredth of the current zoom level (e.g. 1%-steps at 100%).
That would be too fine of increment for me.
For me the super-duper solution was to have two configurable zoom
steps in the presets: 1) a "
Hi Jason,
that's exactly the point! The zoom steps should be proportional to the
current zoom level. And IMHO they could easily be as small as one hundredth
of the current zoom level (e.g. 1%-steps at 100%).
For me the super-duper solution was to have two configurable zoom steps in
the presets: 1)
Hi,
On 10/27/2012 02:55 PM, Bot Obi wrote:
When using the
short-cut keys assigned to"view-zoom-in" and "view-zoom-out" the zoom
steps are hardly ever [the] appropriate [amount]
Why is there no possibility to zoom in and out just the same way like
panning? Why are the zoom steps for "view-zoom-in
After having searched the Web for quite a while I came to the conclusion
that GIMP definitely lacks a clever method to zoom in and out smoothly.
Somewhere I read, that new features or bugs are discussed in this forum.
That's why I post my question here although I'm rather a user than a
developer.
T
