On 2 January 2014 15:04, Joao S. O. Bueno
> On the other hand, it is not currently easy to use GEGL bindings to
> the Python linguage -
> due to tha fact that all binding is delegated to be auto-generated by
> gobject introspection, which in, its turn, is only maintained for
> glib3, gtk+3 - (while
On 2 January 2014 16:05, Michael Natterer wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 00:48 +0100, Ofnuts wrote:
>> In the usual V.R.M numbering, the situation above is typically when you
>> change the version number (and maybe the file extension)... because my
>> point here is not the (completely understandab
On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 00:48 +0100, Ofnuts wrote:
> On 01/01/2014 03:10 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
> > On 31 December 2013 23:26, Ofnuts wrote:
> >> On 12/31/2013 06:36 PM, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> >>> Presumably how far are we to the new 2.10 gimp version?
> >>> How many blocking bugs are left and what ar
On Wed, 2014-01-01 at 19:10 -0800, Akkana Peck wrote:
> >On 31 December 2013 23:26, Ofnuts wrote:
> >>it looks like many plugins won't work anymore and will need
> >>seroius rework...
>
> On 01/01/2014 03:10 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
> >Which plugins do you expect not to work anymore, and why?
>
> I
> OK, maybe I'm pessimistic here, even if some of my python scripts had to be
> reworked between 2.6 and 2.8, which have far less differences than 2.8 and
> 2.10. Then in the current API there are still many values with 0-255 ranges
> (gimp-drawable-{get|set}-pixel (),gimp-histogram) for instance.
>On 31 December 2013 23:26, Ofnuts wrote:
>>it looks like many plugins won't work anymore and will need
>>seroius rework...
On 01/01/2014 03:10 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
>Which plugins do you expect not to work anymore, and why?
I'm sure this isn't what Ofnuts was talking about, but I've noticed
tha
On 01/01/2014 03:10 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
On 31 December 2013 23:26, Ofnuts wrote:
On 12/31/2013 06:36 PM, Marco Ciampa wrote:
Presumably how far are we to the new 2.10 gimp version?
How many blocking bugs are left and what are these?
thanks and happy GNU year...
Will it really be 2.10? Its
On Wed, 2014-01-01 at 15:27 +0100, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> On 01.01.2014 15:21, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
> >
> >> I believe files produced with 2.10 which _does not_ make use of
> >> 2.10-only features can be opened in 2.8. Correct me if
On 01.01.2014 15:21, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
>
>> I believe files produced with 2.10 which _does not_ make use of
>> 2.10-only features can be opened in 2.8. Correct me if I am wrong.
>> 2.10 will be able to open all 2.8 files, of course.
>
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
> I believe files produced with 2.10 which _does not_ make use of
> 2.10-only features can be opened in 2.8. Correct me if I am wrong.
> 2.10 will be able to open all 2.8 files, of course.
If you try that, GIMP 2.8 will tell you it doesn't support
On 31 December 2013 23:26, Ofnuts wrote:
> On 12/31/2013 06:36 PM, Marco Ciampa wrote:
>>
>> Presumably how far are we to the new 2.10 gimp version?
>> How many blocking bugs are left and what are these?
>>
>> thanks and happy GNU year...
>
>
> Will it really be 2.10? Its internals are different,
31 дек. 2013 г. 21:36 пользователь "Marco Ciampa"
написал:
>
> Presumably how far are we to the new 2.10 gimp version?
Nobody knows.
> How many blocking bugs are left and what are these?
Last night we discussed we need some sort of todo to keep track of things
we need to do (on top of bugzilla,
01 янв. 2014 г. 4:12 пользователь "Ofnuts" написал:
>
> On 12/31/2013 11:35 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Ofnuts wrote:
>>
>>> Will it really be 2.10?
>>
>> Yes.
>
>
> Bad decision, then...
There's no pleasing you, is there? :)
You don't even know how much
On 12/31/2013 11:35 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Ofnuts wrote:
Will it really be 2.10?
Yes.
Bad decision, then...
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membershi
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Ofnuts wrote:
> Will it really be 2.10?
Yes.
Alexandre
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List
On 12/31/2013 06:36 PM, Marco Ciampa wrote:
Presumably how far are we to the new 2.10 gimp version?
How many blocking bugs are left and what are these?
thanks and happy GNU year...
Will it really be 2.10? Its internals are different, the file format is
different (will 2.8 be able to load 16/3
Presumably how far are we to the new 2.10 gimp version?
How many blocking bugs are left and what are these?
thanks and happy GNU year...
--
Marco Ciampa
"L'utopia sta all'orizzonte. Mi avvicino di due passi, lei si allontana
di due passi. Faccio dieci passi e l'orizzonte si allontana di d
17 matches
Mail list logo
