Am 18.10.22 um 02:29 schrieb Jehan Pagès via gegl-developer-list:
[...]
Now we could always try to fight against the current and persuade
GNOME infrastructure team, but we made a small opinion tour among the
current core team and nobody really had particular love or use of our
mailing lists. Als
On 6/18/20 11:03 AM, Marco Ciampa via gimp-docs-list wrote:
> My experience is ... the few times I connect into irc, all people are
> connected but nobody's speaking. It seems to me a place where people meet
> after having arranged an appointment or so by any other means...
You can't expect th
On 6/17/20 9:34 PM, Marco Ciampa via gimp-docs-list wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 07:54:40AM +0200, Julien Hardelin wrote:
>> https://docs.gimp.org/2.10/en/ has not been updated since 3 monthes.
That was when the whole infrastructure was migrated to GNOME OpenShift,
and...
>> It was to be
On 10/12/19 9:55 PM, Guenther Schrenk via gimp-docs-list wrote:
> I'm realy confused here. The .sgml file was edited just 3 weeks ago to
> fix a typo, and a month ago someone made a big submit to add meson.build
> files to the repository including the Phyton docs for the Meson Build
> System. Thou
On 9/7/19 8:58 PM, Julien Hardelin wrote:
> msgfmt -c --stat noise.po (ro file): no problem. What is the error about
> this file?
This .po file - and several others - had not been added to git
initially, and when they got added, the untracked files on docs.gimp.org
broke the build.
> Is the prob
On 9/7/19 7:49 AM, Julien Hardelin wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is gimp-help master actually updated automatically? I don't see any
> change in
>
> https://docs.gimp.org/2.10/en/ and other language versions
>
> after pushing new translations, in spite of
> 'Starting documentation build at: Sat Sep 7 04:23:0
Hi,
I had a look at the automated builds on docs.gimp.org recently and found
that the build for 2.10 content - that is https://docs.gimp.org/2.10/en/
and the other language versions - had been blocked by a git checkout
problem for some time.
This has been corrected and the build is restarted, so
On May 29, 2018 8:37:46 AM GMT+02:00, "ΔΗΜΗΤΡΗΣ Σ" wrote:
>[color]
>ui = auto
>[alias]
>up = pull --rebase
>[push]
>default = tracking
>[user]
>email = dmtr...@gmail.com
>name = Dimitris Spingos (Δημήτρης Σπίγγος)
>
>With user name:dmtrs32
>ssh -l $dmtrs32 account.gnome.org
Drop the $
$foo et al
Am 12.07.2017 um 10:40 schrieb Kolbjørn Stuestøl:
> Btw: Windows 7 and newer handles symbolic links.
We have many users on the Windows XP platform, apparently.
Please do not make the docs use file-system-level links, if possible -
these already make deployment on docs.gimp.org more complicated t
On 03/27/2017 08:56 PM, Elle Stone wrote:
> The resulting html page (shown here:
> http://ninedegreesbelow.com/files/desaturate/8-18-desaturate.html) looks
> good.
>
> Is there any reason why I shouldn't (try to) push this patch?
>
> I've been working on this patch for four days now and I'd like
On March 27, 2017 4:29:11 PM GMT+02:00, Julien Hardelin
wrote:
>If you send your patches to bugzilla, the only who will resolve them, is me.
Um... or anyone else with commit access? You don't have to do this all on your
own, there is a number of people who can and do build the docs, and there
On 03/24/2017 04:09 AM, Pat David wrote:
> Hi Elle!
>
> I can't answer the other questions, but 2.9 can be found here:
>
> https://docs.gimp.org/2.9/en/
GIMP 2.8 and GIMP 2.9 will pick up the corresponding help versions when
using the online docs, btw.
See
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gim
On 02/28/2017 01:38 PM, Michael Natterer wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 17:30 +0100, Michael Schumacher wrote:
>> I propose to add a new user or use the b...@gimp.org one for
>> either assignee or qa contact. This enables bug tracking and email
>> notification simply by w
On 02/18/2017 12:12 AM, Michael Natterer wrote:
> So why not delete the branch and re-push it as new
> branch with the proper name gimp-help-2-8-2 ?
Thanks to Mikachu this has been resolved:
- the branch is renamed to gimp-help-2-8-2
- the tag GIMP_HELP_2_8_2 still points to the relese
--
R
Any opinions on this?
Original Message
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=779304
Bug ID: 779304
Summary: Create/Use a common assignee or QA contact user for
GIMP-Manual bugs
The current bugs reported for GIMP-Manual have assi
On 02/17/2017 11:11 PM, Marco Ciampa via gimp-docs-list wrote:
>> There's both a tag and a branch called GIMP_HELP_2_8_2, see
>> https://git.gnome.org/browse/gimp-help-2/refs/
>>
>> The tag has been made on that same branch, so I'm reluctant to try to
>> fix this.
>
> How about deleting the tag
On 02/17/2017 04:54 PM, Kolbjørn Stuestøl wrote:
> "remote: error: refname 'GIMP_HELP_2_8_2' is ambiguous"
>
> A minute later the three files showed up in
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/gimp-help-2/log/. All seems OK.
>
> As it does not seem to be a serious error, I am just curious why this
>
Hi,
the automatic builds for the gimp-help-2 branches are now serving the
online help for GIMP 2.8.x and GIMP 2.9.x, respectively:
gimp-help-2-8
https://docs.gimp.org/2.8/
(https://docs.gimp.org/ are file-system links into there)
and
master
https://docs.gimp.org/2.9/
This means tha
On 02/06/2017 10:10 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> At the same time, translating the 'gimp-help-2-8' branch is probably
> not desirable either, because we are not planning any new help
> releases for GIMP 2.8. So it's up to you which branch you want to
> translate.
Even if we make no more r
Hi all,
we have finally managed to set up automatic builds for the gimp-help-2-8
and master branches of gimp-help-2.
GIMP 2.9.x (aka git master)
--
The master branch builds once per hour, starting at the 23rd minute and
is available on
https://docs.gimp.org/2.9/
This will be picked
On 07/20/2015 08:39 PM, Carol Barsalona wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Prior to downloading our legal department needs to review any agreements when
> using your software. Can you please provide?
Hi Carol,
you can refer your legal department to the Free Software Definition:
https://www.gnu.org/philoso
Hi,
please do not hijack existing threads for new topics - this gets sorting
all wrong (it is sorted inside the thread that is asking for
accessibility documentation.
When starting a new topic, please compose a new message in your mail client.
--
Regards,
Michael
GPG: 96A8 B38A 728A 577D 724D
On 08/05/2015 09:50 PM, James Bush wrote:
> To simplify document repositories for non-developers and other
> contributors not directly involved in GIMP application development,
> Github provides free technical support for issues like this.
What issue are you referring to?
--
Regards,
Michael
On 08/16/2014 02:34 PM, Adrian Woodcraft wrote:
> So WHY can't GIMP find its own Manual in the directory that GIMP
> itself created and installed it in?
We do not know why this happens to some users, although some theories
have been brought up.
For starters, what language does your system use?
On 16.04.2013 04:49, star.m...@hushmail.com wrote:
Dear GIMP team,
I have plan to make a commercial ebook. In one of the chapter i'm going
to review a little bit about GIMP because it's the main software used in
the ebook. The problem is i don't know how to write about the GIMP
toolbox, Image Wi
Hi,
we've been informed that your download of a PDF version of the GIMP user
manual, available at
http://www.databook.cz/gimp-uzivatelska-prirucka-v-ceskem-jazyce-1131,
is in violation of the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL).
The issue is described in a message sent to the gimp-docs-li
On 30.11.2012 23:45, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Thank you for notifying us,
I'm not sure what action needs to be taken. Expecially since you
didn't explain exactly how the PDF file violates the license.
If I got this correct, the creators of the PDF files are adding
additional restrictions t
On 13.06.2012 14:39, Marco Ciampa wrote:
PS: I've swapped language code and version code. The link should be read as:
docs.gimp.org/v.v.v/xx/index.html
Do you really want to have the major, minor and micro version in there?
Regards,
Michael
___
g
> Von: Alexandre Prokoudine
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Roman Joost wrote:
> > There is currently a proposal to change the heading of the 'Pimp my
> > GIMP' section to something less controversal, as it may put off people
> > with it's political incorrectness ("pimp").
> >
> > I know that
29 matches
Mail list logo
