> There are too many things to tell when creating a new layer and and an
> important one is missing
>
> In my experience with Gimp, I haven't got that many use cases:
>
> - Fill: layer is either transparent, or filled with the background color
> - Size: layer is image sized, or the same size as
Hi,
On 2015-12-15 13:51, Joseph Bupe wrote:
There are too many things to tell when creating a new layer and and
an
important one is missing
In my experience with Gimp, I haven't got that many use cases:
- Fill: layer is either transparent, or filled with the background
color
- Size: layer
On 15 December 2015 at 16:52, Jehan wrote:
>
> There were propositions of inverting the click and shift-click (click
> would create directly a layer of your last type and shift-click open the
> dialog),
>
This would be more logical.
Hi,
On 2015-12-15 16:02, Joseph Bupe wrote:
On 15 December 2015 at 16:52, Jehan wrote:
There were propositions of inverting the click and shift-click
(click would create directly a layer of your last type and
shift-click open the dialog),
This would be more logical.
Have you read my email
On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 15:52 +0100, Jehan wrote:
> [...]
> We ended up in just a few emails showing how diverse the user base
> and habits are, and that all 4 fill types are used. [...]
> Because of this problem, we can't just decide to create actions orĀ
> buttons for specific combinations becaus
Why not keep the default as it is today. When you click the new layer
button it opens the new layer dialog, When you shift-click new layer it
makes a new layer with the previously selected options. But we make one
little change to the dialog. At the very bottom of the screen make a check
box that
Hi,
On 2015-12-16 22:21, Andrew Pullins wrote:
Why not keep the default as it is today. When you click the new layer
button it opens the new layer dialog, When you shift-click new layer
it makes a new layer with the previously selected options. But we
make one little change to the dialog. At t