Hi,
Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 23 January 2004 14:29, Marc Dver wrote:
Can someone recommend ways of speeding up Gimp on a WinXP Pro
machine? I'm using GTK+ 2.0 and the stable version of Gimp (the
development version won't install on my machine because it has a
AMD
Hi,
Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TheGIMP -- being built on linux and the defaults set for the excellent
way that linux handles all the different little memory devises that
these computers have -- might need for you to consider your resources
while setting TheGIMP up. More than
Hi,
david [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In other words I have a password and account number and spent some
time entering the info. So what happened??
You can surely point us to the bug number then?
Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Daniel Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hopefully it won't be that long to a next stable release of gimp.
It would be nice to see it in 2004 (albeit late 2004).
I have been asked to point out that is is my opinion and noone has
made any specific plans.
We did indeed make very
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 01:47:47PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Please ignore Carol's ramblings. She is talking mainly bullshit here.
Albeit the fact that she has a gimp.org email address she is not
talking on the behalf of the GIMP developers. At least when she's in
this particular mood.
2.2 is going to have the same core as 2.0, isn't it?
Sven Neumann wrote:
We did indeed make very specific plans for the time after the 2.0
release and decided that we are targetting a GIMP-2.2 release about
six months after 2.0.0 hits the streets.
--
With respect
Alexander Rabtchevich
Hi,
Alexander Rabtchevich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2.2 is going to have the same core as 2.0, isn't it?
Not necessarily. We will try to prepare the core for GEGL and perhaps
even start to use it in a few places. With 2.0 we have come quite far
with our code cleanup and it's about time to
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 04:57:56PM +0200, Steve Crane wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 01:47:47PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Please ignore Carol's ramblings. She is talking mainly bullshit here.
Albeit the fact that she has a gimp.org email address she is not
talking on the behalf of the GIMP
Hi,
Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GSR from this mail list wrote an excellent document on how to set the
tile cache size:
http://mmmaybe.gimp.org/unix/howtos/tile_cache.html
the weird thing is, while it was written for linux, it seems to work
for any computer i have had the luxury
Hi,
david wrote:
I did bother to log on to the bug reporting site and entered the
bugbut it is still occuring.
In other words I have a password and account number and spent some time
entering the info. So what happened??
Excuse me, I misread this (my mind filled in the not).
The
Hi,
Daniel Rogers wrote:
Hopefully it won't be that long to a next stable release of gimp. It
would be nice to see it in 2004 (albeit late 2004).
I have been asked to point out that is is my opinion and noone has made
any specific plans. (From talking with other open source projects,
11 matches
Mail list logo
