On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 14:19, Ville Pätsi wrote:
> These 5.4K bytes were from Thomas Spuhler,
> > I am not so certain that it is the spec file:
> > I may missing a library or something. I get this at the end:
>
> The spec file won't work in 2.0pre3 because some elements that it
> requires were remo
These 5.4K bytes were from Thomas Spuhler,
> I am not so certain that it is the spec file:
> I may missing a library or something. I get this at the end:
The spec file won't work in 2.0pre3 because some elements that it
requires were removed. They have been readded after the mistake was
realised.
On 16 Feb 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Timothy Jedlicka bonzopad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Perhaps a philosophical question/arguement. Using gimp2.0Pre3,
> > visibility changes are added to the undo history. I like to use my
> > visibility (the eyeball) to blink back and forth to see if I
On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 08:03, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thomas Spuhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I tried to build an rpm of the 2.0Pre3 but i get quite some errors
> > toward the end. I am missing a lot of files.
> > I think I have all the required libraries, but it seems during the
>
Hi,
Thomas Spuhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tried to build an rpm of the 2.0Pre3 but i get quite some errors
> toward the end. I am missing a lot of files.
> I think I have all the required libraries, but it seems during the
> compiling process, some things are missing.
> I did it two ways
I tried to build an rpm of the 2.0Pre3 but i get quite some errors
toward the end. I am missing a lot of files.
I think I have all the required libraries, but it seems during the
compiling process, some things are missing.
I did it two ways: renaming the required packages in the gimp.spec file
and
Hi,
Timothy Jedlicka bonzopad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perhaps a philosophical question/arguement. Using gimp2.0Pre3,
> visibility changes are added to the undo history. I like to use my
> visibility (the eyeball) to blink back and forth to see if I like
> the change, however this eats up my
