On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 07:49:34PM -0700, jim feldman wrote:
> I replied at length privately, but water is BAD for emulsions unless
> you're ready to go through a complete re-soak. Unless the re-soak ends
> in a bleach bath, it's probably not going to help, and could make
> matters worse. There a
I replied at length privately, but water is BAD for emulsions unless
you're ready to go through a complete re-soak. Unless the re-soak ends
in a bleach bath, it's probably not going to help, and could make
matters worse. There are some very good sites that discuss photo
material conservation/rest
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 08:33:09PM -0500, Gary Montalbine wrote:
> I have some 40 year old 35mm slides and negatives that have mildew
> on them. What is the best way to clean them? I hope this is not OT.
>
most of what i know about slides i learned 30 years ago -- i suggest
water and a soft lint
Here is the url for the sane/xsane cvs:
http://sane.alioth.debian.org/cvs.html
John Dietsch
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Michael
Schumacher wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:20:06PM -0500, John Culleton wrote:
> >
> >>1. We don't have directions for including XSane in the ne
I have some 40 year old 35mm slides and negatives that have mildew
on them. What is the best way to clean them? I hope this is not OT.
Thanks,
Gary
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
On 20 Mar 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
> "William Skaggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Actually the reality is that Gimp, with the standard plug-ins, does
> > not have the ability to do this, although there are ways to fake
> > something that looks sort of like it. The easiest way to get it
>
Hi,
"William Skaggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually the reality is that Gimp, with the standard plug-ins, does
> not have the ability to do this, although there are ways to fake
> something that looks sort of like it. The easiest way to get it
> would be to modify the "blur" filter (foun
Hi,
John Culleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would someone in community be kind enough to look at and
> hopefully address items 2 and 3 below?
>
> > 2. The dialog for writing a PostScript file still resets
> > to the wrong (for me) values, and I don't know how to set
> > them permanently. I
On Saturday 20 March 2004 12:20 pm, John Culleton wrote:
> 1. We don't have directions for including XSane in the
> new Gimp.
>
OK I sent a followup to Oliver Rauch with cc to this list. I
hope we aren't in some sort of gridlock here.
Would someone in community be kind enough to look at and
hop
As you know Gimp 2.0 cannot use the XSane plug in as it now
exists. I believe Sven Neumann has sent you the necessary
fixes. Can you tell me the status of fixing XSane to work
with the latest Gimp?
--
John Culleton
Able Typesetters and Indexers
http://wexfordpress.com
__
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 07:00:45PM +0100, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
> >On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:20:06PM -0500, John Culleton wrote:
> >
> >>1. We don't have directions for including XSane in the new
> >>Gimp.
> >>
> >
> >this is up to the XSane people. gimp developers hav
Carol Spears wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:20:06PM -0500, John Culleton wrote:
1. We don't have directions for including XSane in the new
Gimp.
this is up to the XSane people. gimp developers have nothing to do with
it. however, one of them hacked it in about 10 minutes but out of
respect
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:20:06PM -0500, John Culleton wrote:
> 1. We don't have directions for including XSane in the new
> Gimp.
>
this is up to the XSane people. gimp developers have nothing to do with
it. however, one of them hacked it in about 10 minutes but out of
respect for the sane p
On Tuesday 16 March 2004 04:28 am, Andrew Langdon-Davies
wrote:
> Using Mandrake-9.2. Gimp-1.2 is installed.
> Having battled my way through configure, make and make
> install and having finally completed the process without
> any apparent error messages, Gimp-2 does not actually
> show up anywher
Actually the reality is that Gimp, with the standard plug-ins, does not have the
ability to do this, although there are ways to fake something that looks sort of
like it. The easiest way to get it would be to modify the "blur" filter (found in
randomize.c in the plug-ins directory) so that the
1. We don't have directions for including XSane in the new
Gimp.
2. The dialog for writing a PostScript file still resets to
the wrong (for me) values, and I don't know how to set them
permanently. I want no offsets, inches instead of cm, and
encapsulated Postscript.
3. The text tool is diff
Le 20.03.2004 17:04, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) a écrit :
Le 19.03.2004 21:36, Sven Neumann a écrit :
Hi,
"Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
When I display the histogram with gimp-2.0-pre, I got about nothing
for many pictures when in linear mode.
For these pictures, you will want
Le 19.03.2004 21:40, David Neary a écrit :
Hi,
Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
When I display the histogram with gimp-2.0-pre, I got about nothing
for
many pictures when in linear mode.
In linear mode you'll normally have a couple of peaks drowning
out everything else.
I have not notices anythign p
18 matches
Mail list logo
