To recap:
OP is having trouble building gimp-perl. He's told to install the
gimp-devel package. Fine advice, and something a newbie may not realize
at first.
Installing gimp-devel should've been enough, but he got another error.
After further analysis, it became apparent that he was missing the g
I bought a Wacom Graphire 3 a year ago for about $100. I think the new
generation of tablets have just come out. You may be able to find the
older generation on sale, or on Ebay. The tablet works reasonably
well for me with Gimp on XP Pro SP2.
-gary
http://www.eighteenpercent.net
http://www.pbase
I currently use the Gimp on the Windows XP operating system and was wondering if anyone could tell me where I could get a reasonably priced graphics tablet and pen from. Thank you in advance.
Yahoo! Shopping
Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:54:33PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
> On Sunday 11 December 2005 15:13, Manish Singh wrote:
> [...]
>
> > When distro people screw up and the support issues land here, I feel
> > justified to express my displeasure of having to clean up their
> > messes, especially since they
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 01:27:17PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
> On Sunday 11 December 2005 05:25, Manish Singh wrote:
> [...]
> > I put thought into it. As I pointed out in my other mail, it seems
> > like you're the one who didn't think things through before sending
> > out emails.
> >
> > A gimp-deve
On Sunday 11 December 2005 12:07, michael chang wrote:
[...]
> The essential question is if it is _NECESSARY_ to compile gimp-perl
> for the user's system. No one using SuSE has answered this.
>
> Do you currently have a SuSE 9.2 Pro system accesssable to you? It
> would be nice if you could get
The Page Curl filter -- can it be adjusted so that the page is
"less" curled. Curled only on the corner, for example, or
only a quarter of the page?
Thanks,
Helen, using Gimp 2.2.9 on SuSE 10
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
h
On Sunday 11 December 2005 13:18, Akkana Peck wrote:
> Manish Singh writes:
> > But one of Myke's problems was that he managed to get the
> > gimp-devel package installed without having glib-devel installed.
> > This means that
>
> SuSE users trying to get gimp-devel working (e.g. to compile
> plug
On Sunday 11 December 2005 15:13, Manish Singh wrote:
[...]
> When distro people screw up and the support issues land here, I feel
> justified to express my displeasure of having to clean up their
> messes, especially since they actually charge money and have a
> support and QA staff who have a jo
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:28:32PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-11-05 15:16]:
> >
> > So yes, let's end this, and next time, stick to facts instead of your
> > emotional attachment to your distro.
> >
>
> So Pat offers his hand and you slap his face, ca
* Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-11-05 15:16]:
>
> So yes, let's end this, and next time, stick to facts instead of your
> emotional attachment to your distro.
>
So Pat offers his hand and you slap his face, cannot accept a graceful
exit. You present yourself as a pathetic, immature, clas
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 10:41:47AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 02:25:07AM -0800, Manish Singh wrote:
>
> > A gimp-devel package *must* have a dependency that either directly or
> > indirectly pulls in glib-devel. If it doesn't, the package's dependency
> > specificati
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 01:27:17PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
> On Sunday 11 December 2005 05:25, Manish Singh wrote:
> [...]
> > I put thought into it. As I pointed out in my other mail, it seems
> > like you're the one who didn't think things through before sending
> > out emails.
> >
> > A gimp-deve
Akkana Peck wrote:
Manish Singh writes:
But one of Myke's problems was that he managed to get the gimp-devel
package installed without having glib-devel installed. This means that
SuSE users trying to get gimp-devel working (e.g. to compile
plug-ins) will probably also need to install XF
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 02:25:07AM -0800, Manish Singh wrote:
> A gimp-devel package *must* have a dependency that either directly or
> indirectly pulls in glib-devel. If it doesn't, the package's dependency
> specification is broken.
> SuSE has a history of being shoddy in this regard, other exa
On Sunday 11 December 2005 05:25, Manish Singh wrote:
[...]
> I put thought into it. As I pointed out in my other mail, it seems
> like you're the one who didn't think things through before sending
> out emails.
>
> A gimp-devel package *must* have a dependency that either directly or
> indirectly
Manish Singh writes:
> But one of Myke's problems was that he managed to get the gimp-devel
> package installed without having glib-devel installed. This means that
SuSE users trying to get gimp-devel working (e.g. to compile
plug-ins) will probably also need to install XFree86-libs-dev.
I don't k
On Sunday 11 December 2005 05:16, Manish Singh wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 10:10:50PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
> > To Manish Singh:
> > SuSE and YaST2 work as well or better than any other file install
> > utility at solving dependencies. Thing you fail to realize is that
> > -devel files are n
Steve Stavropoulos wrote:
On 12/8/05, Tom Williams wrote:
My question: is there anyway to use Gimp to scale the 640x480 images so
they look as best as possible (no pixelation if possible) as 4x6
prints?
You can look at
http://www.greyc.ensicaen.fr/~dtschump/greycstoration/index.html and
On 12/10/05, BandiPat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 10 December 2005 20:12, michael chang wrote:
> > Trying to answer Pat's cry for a summary...
> [...]
> > --
> > ~Mike
> > - Just the crazy copy cat.
>
>
> Thanks Mike for the reprint. Also, no need to send out two mails. I'm
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 10:14:29PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
> On Saturday 10 December 2005 13:50, Manish Singh wrote:
> [...]
> > So, with installing glib2-devel, did that work? If not, install
> > gtk-devel, pango-devel, and atk-devel as well.
> >
> > It's rather disappointing that after all these y
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 10:10:50PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
> To Manish Singh:
> SuSE and YaST2 work as well or better than any other file install
> utility at solving dependencies. Thing you fail to realize is that
> -devel files are not dependencies. The main files don't need the
> -devel file
22 matches
Mail list logo
