Hi,
> Perhaps I misunderstood. It was my imprssion that over time there would be a
> conversion from ScriptFu to Python. If there is a problem with 2.3.13 then
> the problem will persist with 2.4.x
There's no problem with Python in 2.3.13 (and no plans for a transition
to Python). You are havi
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 1:23 pm, John R. Culleton wrote:
> Assuming that there is a directory /usr/local/gimp-23.13 where
> should I unpack the help files so that Gimp can find them?
> Slackware Linux 11.
In my installation (SUSE), the Gimp help files are
in /opt/gnome/share/gimp/2.0/help.
Assuming that there is a directory /usr/local/gimp-23.13 where should I unpack
the help files so that Gimp can find them? Slackware Linux 11.
--
John Culleton
Able Indexing and Typesetting
Precision typesetting (tm) at reasonable cost.
Satisfaction guaranteed.
http://wexfordpress.com
_
On Friday 05 January 2007 14:58, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 09:03 -0500, John R. Culleton wrote:
> > On my Slackware Linux 11 partition I get an error message on ./configure
> > of 2.3.13:
> > checking for PYGTK... no
> > configure: error:
> > *** Could not find PyGTK.
>
>
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 13:14, Robin Laing wrote:
> Is the Gimp just as good as Photoshop?
>
> Yes, for the average home user, the Gimp is just as good as Photoshop.
> The gimp has layers, alpha channels, a robust plugin architecture, I
> could go on but they have a pretty good overview of wha
Is the Gimp just as good as Photoshop?
Yes, for the average home user, the Gimp is just as good as Photoshop.
The gimp has layers, alpha channels, a robust plugin architecture, I
could go on but they have a pretty good overview of what the Gimp is
capable of at Gimp.org.
Gimp vs. Photoshop
ht