-- Forwarded message --
From: carol irvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Oct 1, 2007 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] floating selection
To: Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It kept happening no matter what I tried UNTIL I tried this anchoring. Then
I flattened after I anchored. I could then
I've done some photography but usually I end up painting over it and
converting it to mixed media as I really prefer painting to photography. I
think for users who are drawn to art and painting, GIMP may satisfy their
needs more easily. The adage "pare it down" typically is a good one for all
art
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-01-07 13:29]
>> In any event, from what you've told me, GIMP may not be the right tool
>> for me at this time. I want to retain all my bits. So until GIMP
>> natively supports 12-bits or higher, I'm gonna have to stick to
>> Photoshop for n
* Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-01-07 13:29]:
> I normally don't shoot in RAW because, from what I've read, it seems
> difficult to work with, but it also sounds interesting, too.
no more so than any other graphic format...
> Also, I've read that not all RAW apps are created equal, that you can
--- carol irvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I go to crop something, Gimp crops it very nicely but, unlike,
> PS, the image is then impossible to do anything else with as I now
> have a floating layer.
Interesting. Does this happen with GIMP's file format and/or others?
I was cropping an
--- jim feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've posted this before, and in case you missed it, you really need
> to do a bit of digital "darkroom" 101. Go to www.normankoren.com and
> read through his site. Really. I'm not trying to be pedantic or
> condescending, but when you finish going thr
--- Leon Brooks GIMP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...it usually carries a kind of expressiveness that plaid old English
> often lacks. (-:
I prefer tartan or houndstooth English myself. :)
Check out the
