David Gowers <00a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Fatbob wrote:
> > Gimp newbie here.
> >
> > How do you enter QMask mode?
>
> "the left-bottom button in the image window"
>
> http://docs.gimp.org/en/gimp-using-quickmask.html
Or the Shift+Q key.
--
> Using Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) Linux.
>
> If I have a newly created "untitled" image and I Close it, I
> naturally,
> and correctly, get a dialog asking me if I wish to save it or not save
> it.
>
> In that dialog, pneumonic letters are underlined, meaning that I
> _should_ simply be ab
Using Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) Linux.
If I have a newly created "untitled" image and I Close it, I naturally,
and correctly, get a dialog asking me if I wish to save it or not save it.
In that dialog, pneumonic letters are underlined, meaning that I
_should_ simply be able to type that l
David,
Thanks for that clarification.
I made the mistake of thinking of how I do it in Photoshop which has a
single "resize image" dialog where things are not so neatly divided as
they are in Gimp. In Gimp there is a "Print Size" dialog. My bad.
Jay
On 04/07/2009 07:01 PM, David Gowers wrote:
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 20:38 -0400, Ajay Gautam wrote:
> I have been tasked with coding image effects (filters), such as
> spherize, and zigzag effects.
Do a google search for comp.graphics.algorithms. That should have some
pointers, though I don't know if they specifically cover spherize or
zigza
This is most likely off-topic, but this is the best bunch of people to
ask...
I have been tasked with coding image effects (filters), such as spherize,
and zigzag effects.
Pointers on where to start would be highly appreciated. Looking for
algorithms, best practices etc...
Thanks in advance
Aja
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Fatbob wrote:
> Gimp newbie here.
>
> How do you enter QMask mode?
"the left-bottom button in the image window"
http://docs.gimp.org/en/gimp-using-quickmask.html
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.ED
Gimp newbie here.
How do you enter QMask mode?
Thanks!
- Original Message -
From: "David Gowers" <00a...@gmail.com>
To: "Olivier Lecarme"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 8:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Masking for Contrast Control - Can this be done
inGimp?
> On Wed, Apr 1, 20
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Jay Smith wrote:
> Norman,
>
> So, to scan that postage stamp that you want to turn into a wall poster,
> you might scan it at a very high 2400 x 2400 resolution. Then, in your
> image program, change the size from 1x1-inch up to 20x20 inches AT THE
> VERY SAME T
norman wrote:
> In a book I am reading, under the heading of scanners, it says that
> the scanner resolution should be 600 pixels per inch. When I look at
> scanner specifications resolution is quoted as dpi. Please, are these
> the same?
Useful information here regarding terminology:
http://www.
Just to muddy the waters further, when you get into dpi with printers, it opens
up a whole 'nother can of worms...at least as I understand from researching the
subject on the net.
With regard to printing, dpi and ppi are two seperate things. A printer might
have a certain dpi rating, but that
I'm trying to make a simple map that I can import to a MS Word
document for print purposes and I'm having a couple of challenges.
When I make a straight line it is very jagged and the text looks
pretty bad when I print it out on paper.
I can add the text after I import to Word if necessary but
< great big snip >
This topic has certainly brought lots of reaction and my thanks to all.
My intention is to buy a new scanner which I want to use for scanning
photographs prior to carrying out restoration work. I use Ubuntu 8.10,
GIMP and XSane.
The book I have says that I should look for a sca
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:36:41 -0400, Jeffrey Brent McBeth wrote:
> if you have 4800x9600 ppi, and you scan an inch square of material,
> you will end up with 4800x9600 pixels. Thus the question if you are
> having a laugh, as your question seemed trivial.
Actually, you'll most likely end up with 9
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 03:37:57PM +0100, norman wrote:
>
> > As for your original question.
> > if you have 4800x9600 ppi, and you scan an inch square of material,
> > you will end up with 4800x9600 pixels. Thus the question if you are
> > having a laugh, as your question seemed trivial.
>
> I
Norman,
I hope I have not misconstrued your question / wording.
You used the word "scan" in conjunction with your camera. Your camera
is not a scanner. It has a very different dpi/ppi than a scanner.
Scanners use A x B dots/pixels maximum per square inch. However, what
you get from your scann
* norman [04-07-09 10:40]:
>
> I am really sorry you see my questions as trivial, they are not meant
> to be. Much of my difficulty is one of understanding the terminology
> used.
yes, there are several aspects to consider.
> For example and, assuming I understand correctly, if I scan a
> phot
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 00:18 +0930, Michaela Baulderstone wrote:
> I'm 36 with a post grad degree & I can't figure out how to get an image to
> specific size
Image->Scale, unless I misunderstand your need here.
--
Michael J. HammelPrincipal Software Engineer
m
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 15:37 +0100, norman wrote:
> I scan a photograph
> which is, say, 5 inches square and then display that scan on my monitor,
> it will measure 24,000 pixels X 48,000 pixels. To test this on my rather
> cheap Canon LIDE20 I scanned a picture which is 5 inches square saved
> the
I'm 36 with a post grad degree & I can't figure out how to get an image to
specific size
Cheers
M
-Original Message-
From: gimp-user-boun...@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
[mailto:gimp-user-boun...@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of norman
Sent: Wednesday, 8 April 2009 12:08 AM
To: gimp-user@lis
< snip >
> As for your original question.
> if you have 4800x9600 ppi, and you scan an inch square of material,
> you will end up with 4800x9600 pixels. Thus the question if you are
> having a laugh, as your question seemed trivial.
I am really sorry you see my questions as trivial, they are not
Hi Gimp users and developers,
I noticed that using two displays is cause of error in the tool
position. The tool position does not match with the pointer position.
What is even more tedious is that if I go back to the single display
configuration, Gimp continues to fail. I have to reinstall Gimp.
M
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 02:21:26PM +0100, norman wrote:
>
> > Are you testing us here?
> >
> > You have given the dots per inch, dpi, resolution of the scanner and
> > were just told that dots/pixels per inch measurements were the same.
> > What is it that you want to know?
>
> There is no questi
> > Could you please also clarify another thing. In the specification for
> > a scanner it has Optical Resolution 4800 dpi X 9600 dpi. From this how
> > should I calculate pixels per inch?
> >
>
> Are you testing us here?
>
> You have given the dots per inch, dpi, resolution of the scanner and
* norman [04-07-09 08:35]:
>
> Could you please also clarify another thing. In the specification for
> a scanner it has Optical Resolution 4800 dpi X 9600 dpi. From this how
> should I calculate pixels per inch?
>
Are you testing us here?
You have given the dots per inch, dpi, resolution of th
> > In a book I am reading, under the heading of scanners, it says that the
> > scanner resolution should be 600 pixels per inch. When I look at scanner
> > specifications resolution is quoted as dpi. Please, are these the same?
>
> Yes, dpi = dots per inch = pixels per inch.
Thank you.
Could y
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:06:43 +0100, norman wrote:
> In a book I am reading, under the heading of scanners, it says that the
> scanner resolution should be 600 pixels per inch. When I look at scanner
> specifications resolution is quoted as dpi. Please, are these the same?
Yes, dpi = dots per inch
In a book I am reading, under the heading of scanners, it says that the
scanner resolution should be 600 pixels per inch. When I look at scanner
specifications resolution is quoted as dpi. Please, are these the same?
Norman
___
Gimp-user mailing list
G
Hello,
I have a .xcf file with about 100 layers with text in them (and nothing
else). They all use the same font, same size, and I want to change the
size on all of them.
Ideally I could do this all at once. Next best would be to activate
each layer individually and change the size without rety
On Windows, I can go to GIMP\bin and type ufraw-batch in a Dos
command window. I can also type ufraw -help and that brings
up a large window full of options -- that unfortunately goes
off the bottom of my screen so I can't read the whole thing.
I found that if I save the configuration in ufraw, t
>< big snip >
>
>When UFRaw opens on my machine towards the bottom of the panel, on the
>left hand side, there is 'Denoise' with a slider, isn't this to remove
>noise? I am using Ubuntu 8.10.
>
>Norman
>
>
Well, I tried to reply using my Gmail, but don't think it went to the right
place. In any ev
Noise Ninja works very well -- for some things. For outdoor
"nature" shots, it works too well. Reducing noise takes the
detail out of natural textures like snow, water, forests and
ground cover.
Noise Ninja makes great skys and clouds though. But you have to fiddle
to get the rest of the detail
32 matches
Mail list logo
