On Tuesday 09 June 2009 09:59:10 pm bumpkin wrote:
> The graphics guy sent me our logo as a .jpg so I created a new
> file with the appropriate dimensions in the lasest GIMP for
> windows. I imported and scaled down the logo to the appropriate
> size and placed it at the top, finished adding the te
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Erik Lotspeich wrote:
> The fact that the Gimp engineers haven't integrated these two printing
> systems is unacceptable -- they should be ashamed. Gimp will never be
> taken seriously until this printing nightmare is resolved. I am a
> software engineer myself,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Chris,
I appreciate your feedback. Looking at the history of gutenprint only
solidifies my point which is:
Native Gimp printing = FAIL
Gutenprint (Gimp plug-in) = WIN
My distro is OpenSUSE 11.1 which is a popular, modern Linux distribution
backe
On Saturday 25 July 2009, Erik Lotspeich wrote:
>Hi Chris,
>
>I appreciate your feedback. Looking at the history of gutenprint only
>solidifies my point which is:
>
>Native Gimp printing = FAIL
>Gutenprint (Gimp plug-in) = WIN
>
>My distro is OpenSUSE 11.1 which is a popular, modern Linux distribu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gene,
Your point is well taken. I do not expect the Gimp people to keep on
top of printing at all.
But why not have Gutenprint be a pre-requisite to Gimp? Why deliver a
broken default printing system?
For the record, my distro does deliver the
< snip >
> Just imagine a novice Linux user. Imagine your mother-in-law who wants
> to print a photo with Gimp. She will fail. That is my point. I think
> that you all are missing the point that I'm making. Your mother-in-law
> will be confused by "Print" and "Print with Gutenprint". Nobody
