[Repost after a list resurrection]
On 2009-09-19, Jason van Gumster wrote:
>> Suggestion: Would it be possible as you "walk" the path, to compare each
>> pixel to prior and if they are the "same" to within the threshold
>> tolerance skip that pixel and proceed to next? My theory being that
[Repost after a list resurrection]
On 2009-09-15, saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com
wrote:
> a Script-fu which does this for Fuzzy selections; the command is added
> to the context menu raised by right-clicking on a path in the Paths
> Dialog. The script can be retrieved f
elekis writes:
> hi,
>
> just a little test, cause it's a second time I recieve a respond like
> that and that I m not in the archive.
>
> This is the Spam & Virus Firewall at bc4.EECS.Berkeley.EDU.
>
> I'm sorry to inform you that the message below could not be delivered.
> When delivery was att
On Friday 25 September 2009, Greg S. wrote:
> This is the 3rd time I have posted this item and it has not
> appeared in the forum.
> Has anyone installed gimp 2.6.7 on Centos 5.3 or Redhat EL5.
>
> I have searched the net and there appears to be no rpm's for the
> above OS's.
>
> Has anyone got any
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Ken Warner wrote:
> Working with 16 bit per channel images will be great!
>
> 16 bits per channel is essential when working with high
> dynamic range (HDR) images.
>
> What is the timeline for 2.10/3.0?
I believe you'll find that you can only get a meaningful time
On 09/28/2009 02:29 AM, Jude T. wrote:
>> Jude T. schreef:
>>
>>> I know I have seen, in the Gimp Manual, a way of adjusting a photo that's
>>>
> been
>
>>> taken on a bit of a slant - for instance a photo of a window. I have a
>>>
> photo
>
>>> where my horizon is on
Working with 16 bit per channel images will be great!
16 bits per channel is essential when working with high
dynamic range (HDR) images.
What is the timeline for 2.10/3.0?
Martin Nordholts wrote:
> On 09/29/2009 03:36 AM, Phil Labonte wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have looked online on the Gimp site
On Tuesday 29 September 2009 01:05:40 pm Joerg Bergmann
wrote:
> > as far as i know, GIMP processes colors with 16 bit precision when "use
> > GEGL" is enabled from the "colors" menu. work is in progress to make it
> > possible to fully support opening & saving of 16 bit (or higher?) images.
>
Am Dienstag, den 29.09.2009, 11:48 +0530 schrieb phanisvara das:
> On Tuesday 29 September 2009 07:06:52 am Phil Labonte wrote:
> > have looked online on the Gimp site and I am not clear if Gimp
> > supports 16 or 24 or 32 bit images?
>
> as far as i know, GIMP processes colors with 16 bit precis
