Program, and that no one
> intended
> any offense, but until the name is changed this discussion will recur - at
> least once every several months. It's up to you.
>
>
Well, anyone... when there are only native English speakers left on the
planet.
dered a human
being on this planet :-))
Again, I will adhere to nettiquette, but I felt I should give some
counter-arguments.
By the way, the GIMP is a great program!
regards, Jogchum Reitsma
>
>
>
> ___
> Gimp-user mailing list
> G
Sven Neumann schreef:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 21:35 +0200, Jogchum Reitsma wrote:
>
>
>> Seems a perfect solution, be it that in my case (Suse 11.1), the first
>> make fails with
>> <...>
>>
>> Any idea what that might be?
>>
Sven Neumann schreef:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 11:05 -0400, Jay Smith wrote:
>
>
>> I know nothing of the workflow that results in the current HTML manual
>> format. It would seem to me that producing one or more other formats
>> should come out of that same workflow.
>>
>
> Indeed.
Jogchum Reitsma schreef:
> I feel kinda stupid to have to ask this question, because it seems so
> very basic... But I can't figure it out myself (and didn't find it in
> the documentation or mail archive), so I hope to get help here.
>
> I've got a drawing consist
I feel kinda stupid to have to ask this question, because it seems so
very basic... But I can't figure it out myself (and didn't find it in
the documentation or mail archive), so I hope to get help here.
I've got a drawing consisting of a photo, a color-filled ellips, and two
lines of text. Eac
Sven Neumann schreef:
Hi,
the GIMP developers are proud to release version 2.2 of the GNU Image
Manipulation Program. About nine months after version 2.0 hit the
road, we have completed another development cycle and can bring a new
stable GIMP to our user's desktops.
Hi all developers,
Maybe, be
Michael Schumacher schreef:
Jogchum Reitsma wrote:
I'm afraid I have to confirm John's problem: there simply is no file
called gimp-2.0.pc on my system.
So the question is IMHO not how to direct configure to the place the
file is on disk (there is no such place) but where that file can
list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
thanks for any answer!
kind greetings, Jogchum Reitsma
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Carol Spears wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 07:09:40PM +0100, Jogchum Reitsma wrote:
Frankly, I did read INSTALL, and also that section, but didn't think the
solution offered there would bring me luck.
But after your reply I did
export LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib"
before ru
Hi,
Sorry, just after I sent my previous posting I realized I should have
added that I indeed checked /etc/ld.so.conf. Indeed /usr/local/lib is in
there, and only after checking this I ran ldconfig.
I'll try Carol's hint tomorrow - going to bed now.
thanks again, greetings, Jogchum
Sven Neumann
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Jogchum Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I did a ./configure on the gimp-2.2 source (not the CVS-line), and it
complained about not finding the TIFF-library. So I downloaded that
(v. 3.70), compiled and installed it (the libraries install in
/usr/local/lib) a
doing wrong?
Thanks,
Jogchum Reitsma
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
inal layer, but also nothing. I
tried several other thing, nothing.
When I make a completely new image, the sharp pencil do what I
expect from it.
I use Gimp 2.0, on SuSE Linux 9.0.
What do I do wrong?
Any help appreciated!
kind greetings, Jogchum Reitsma
_
14 matches
Mail list logo
