/rotflmao :-) lol/
Brendan wrote:
>On Thursday 21 December 2006 21:06, Tom Williams wrote:
>
>
>>Brendan wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Monday 18 December 2006 19:52, lists wrote:
>>>
>>>
Carter castor wrote:
>This goes right to the heart of my biggest complaint about GI
is this "teacher" getting a bribe
from the photoshop salesman?
operator
John R. Culleton wrote:
ON another list someone was complaining about the expense nad bother of
upgrading to the latest Photoshop, including licenses etc. I suggested Gimp
as a no cost/no fuss alter
That's great! I really like that
idea :-)
operator
David Marrs wrote:
Anthony Ettinger wrote:
On 12/8/06, Jerry Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I light of the Microsoft/Novell agreement and all of this talk about GPL
3, I was just curious if the gi