On 10/11/05, Harish Narayanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cedric GEMY wrote:
Testing 2.3, i can there is new interpolation method called Lanczos.
It is described as being better than cubic. Does anyboy know simply :)
how it works with the picture ?
Actually, on a more generic level, is
Øyvind Kolås wrote:
Comparisons of different interpolation methods (in this case not for
scaling, but resampling for transformations like rotation.)
http://www.path.unimelb.edu.au/~dersch/interpolator/interpolator.html
Thank you, that was very informative.
Harish
--
Carol Spears wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 01:38:43AM +0200, cedric GEMY wrote:
Testing 2.3, i can there is new interpolation method called Lanczos. It
is described as being better than cubic. Does anyboy know simply :) how
it works with the picture ?
what is more (or less) in my
cedric GEMY wrote:
Testing 2.3, i can there is new interpolation method called Lanczos.
It is described as being better than cubic. Does anyboy know simply :)
how it works with the picture ?
Actually, on a more generic level, is there some place (other than the
source) where one can look up
Testing 2.3, i can there is new interpolation method called Lanczos. It
is described as being better than cubic. Does anyboy know simply :) how
it works with the picture ?
Cedric
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 01:38:43AM +0200, cedric GEMY wrote:
Testing 2.3, i can there is new interpolation method called Lanczos. It
is described as being better than cubic. Does anyboy know simply :) how
it works with the picture ?
Err, a quick summary (perhaps not simple) is that Cubic
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 01:38:43AM +0200, cedric GEMY wrote:
Testing 2.3, i can there is new interpolation method called Lanczos. It
is described as being better than cubic. Does anyboy know simply :) how
it works with the picture ?
i found this on wikipedia:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 01:38:43AM +0200, cedric GEMY wrote:
Testing 2.3, i can there is new interpolation method called Lanczos. It
is described as being better than cubic. Does anyboy know simply :) how
it works with the picture ?
what is more (or less) in my testing of cubic vs linear,
