On 08/10/2009 01:55 AM, Robert N. Lott III wrote:
> Are there still plans to implement Layer Styles?
Yes, we can't call GIMP high-end without such a feature. It is
impossible to say when we will have it implemented, but we are
constantly working towards it.
/ Martin
--
My GIMP Blog:
http:/
Are there still plans to implement Layer Styles? Example: <
http://www.tutorialized.com/view/tutorial/Underwater-Text-Effect-in-Photoshop/50439
>
This would make GIMP much better and has been requested since **2002**. <
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79025>. Is there a particular
reason
LOL! Yes, I see that it has :-]
It does look good too, very much indeed. Thanks for pointing it out,
Sven, saved me of quite a bunch of working hours.
Sorry for the many posts (and thanks those who helped). How can you work
with a 24 hour timedelay? Oh well..
See ya all
-centipede
>
> This h
Hi,
Rene Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm surprised nobody has hacked on that before. After all, it's all
> there: Parasites that gets saved with the image/layer, a python
> module that can update the editor-view live, a complete scripting
> language with gtk bindings.
>
> I spend a handf
I'm surprised nobody has hacked on that before. After all, it's all
there: Parasites that gets saved with the image/layer, a python module
that can update the editor-view live, a complete scripting language with
gtk bindings.
I spend a handful of hours trying to make a proof-of-concept. See what
y
I'm surprised nobody has hacked on that before.
After all, it's allthere: Parasites that gets saved with the image/layer, a
python modulethat can update the editor-view live, a complete scripting
language withgtk bindings.
I spend a handful of hours trying to make a
proof-of-concept. See w
