Hi,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i was talking with one of the people working on gimp-python and maybe
> previews for the scripts are more reasonable than i made it sound.
Scripts written using the Python bindings can actually be considered
plug-ins. Since there's a pretty much com
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 03:08:14PM -0400, michael chang wrote:
> On 7/3/05, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i also can see what a huge effort it would be, coding-wise, to give
> > preview access to gimp scripters. it might be a case on my part of a
> > little knowledge is a bad thing,
Hi!
Simon and Carol had already said what there is to say.
I am only writing this to explain why there are "full image" previews:
the things that do full image previews, in the layers->colors menu
are implemented as native gimp tools (just like the paint brush).
While most of the things that d
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 11:38:45PM +0200, Pierre-Alexis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a couple of thoughts that may (or may not)
> interest you :
> - it's too bad that Gimp's filters' previews don't
> allow you to zoom in/out... it makes them almost
> useless in many cases ! it's sad too that some fi
Pierre-Alexis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have a couple of thoughts that may (or may not)
> interest you :
> - it's too bad that Gimp's filters' previews don't
> allow you to zoom in/out... it makes them almost
> useless in many cases ! it's sad too that some filters
> don't even have a preview.
Hello,
I have a couple of thoughts that may (or may not)
interest you :
- it's too bad that Gimp's filters' previews don't
allow you to zoom in/out... it makes them almost
useless in many cases ! it's sad too that some filters
don't even have a preview...
- it's a little strange (but not serious)
