-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>
> So here's the thing: we need to come to a decision out of this. We suck
> at that.
>
a. The more people hear about gimp, the more people will use it.
b. this does not cost the developers any extra
c. then the more people there will be to ask fo
Simon Budig wrote:
And should we ever need a bigger amount of silkscreened shirts and we
know in advance that a certain amount gets sold immediately, I'd like
to suggest Petra / Kernelconcepts and I can guarantee immediate
control over the artwork and the quality of the shirt.
As
Sven Neumann wrote:
What exactly does this arrangement involve? We can hardly decide
anything w/o knowing what we are talking about. Does it mean that
sourcewear will be the only official merchandiser?
Personally, I think there should be one 'Merchandise' link on the front
page which links to
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
I've thought more about the whole thing and I would like to propose
the following solution:
We add a page about GIMP merchandising to www.gimp.org. This page
("GIMP Stuff" ?) gets linked from the sidebar and from the Donations
page and it is mentioned on the front page
Hi Dave.
First of all - because you seem to be concerned about that - I'll
readily admit, that Federicos Company is a good one. Otherwise we would
not even need to discuss this.
Second: My concerns are certainly influenced by the fact, that two of my
closest friends run a company that also does f
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
For their part, they would like to continue having their logo on the
arm (which I'm OK with)
The logo on the arm is definitely what keeps me (and probably others)
from buying this stuff. I wouldn't dare to leave home wearing one
Hi,
I've thought more about the whole thing and I would like to propose
the following solution:
We add a page about GIMP merchandising to www.gimp.org. This page
("GIMP Stuff" ?) gets linked from the sidebar and from the Donations
page and it is mentioned on the front page at the time it is adde
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The GIMP is not for profit. I don't contribute
to fill someone's wallet. I don't mind people
selling GIMP logo stuff independently, but advertizing
for for-profit entities is definitely out-of-scope.
Furthermore, there are many other issues.
For example, it's
Hi,
Jay Cox a écrit :
Has anyone here seen the quality of their shirts? Are they screen
printed or heat transfered? I prefer screen printed tshirts, but
gradients like the ones we have in the gimp logo dont usually screen
print very well.
I'll let Federico answer the question about whether
Hi,
Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For their part, they would like to continue having their logo on the
> arm (which I'm OK with)
The logo on the arm is definitely what keeps me (and probably others)
from buying this stuff. I wouldn't dare to leave home wearing one of
these shirts. It
Hi Simon,
Simon Budig a écrit :
And what is involved with being the "official merchandiser"?
How would we handle other companies trying to sell Gimp merchandise and
want similiar exposure? Do we need an official merchandiser?
Essentially, this is what it comes down to ("de we need an official
Dave Neary ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> For their part, they would like to continue having their logo on the arm
> (which I'm OK with), and they would like to be our official merchandiser
> - that is, have a place in the sidebar on every page, and a place of
> prominence on the front page.
Well
12 matches
Mail list logo
