Re: [Gimp-user] Thoughts about channels

2004-09-21 Thread Eric Pierce
And please, try to be less aggressive on this mailing-list. If you want to, you can continue your pointless rants elsewhere but please let this list be a friendly place where GIMP users and developers can exchange their ideas and experiences and help each others. a-fucking-greed (i.e.,

Re: [Gimp-user] Thoughts about channels

2004-09-17 Thread Carol Spears
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 12:33:26PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: liar. Carol, I am not going to let you call me a liar on the GIMP mailing-lists. I hereby ask you to apologize for this. Otherwise I will have to ask for your gimp.org mail address to be

Re: [Gimp-user] Thoughts about channels

2004-09-17 Thread Carol Spears
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 11:14:54PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: apologize for what? I think I have been pretty clear here. I want your public apologies for calling me a liar. It's simple: you state that you have been wrong and apologize for it.

Re: [Gimp-user] Thoughts about channels

2004-09-17 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No I am not. You are confusing the two. I have read the script and I am pretty sure that what I said is correct. However that is not at all the point here. at this point a real german would back this up with documentation. i am the stupid

Re: [Gimp-user] Thoughts about channels

2004-09-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: liar. Carol, I am not going to let you call me a liar on the GIMP mailing-lists. I hereby ask you to apologize for this. Otherwise I will have to ask for your gimp.org mail address to be revoked and you being excluded from this list. I don't think

Re: [Gimp-user] Thoughts about channels

2004-09-14 Thread Carol Spears
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 12:06:20PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: i must ask you, did you ever install gimp-perl, much less use it? i don't remember this ever occuring. maybe some solemn vows and promises to never use it but at no time can i recall you

[Gimp-user] Thoughts about channels

2004-09-13 Thread cedric
May be someone has another feeling, but i've found today strange behaviors. 1. Copy Visible does not copie visible, but the visible of layer aspect. Explanation : just deactivate a channel (R for exemple) the copy visible picture is the same as if they were all activated. Is there any way to

Re: [Gimp-user] Thoughts about channels

2004-09-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, cedric [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 1. Copy Visible does not copie visible, but the visible of layer aspect. Explanation : just deactivate a channel (R for exemple) the copy visible picture is the same as if they were all activated. Is there any way to overpass that ? Well, you

Re: [Gimp-user] Thoughts about channels

2004-09-13 Thread Carol Spears
hello, this was an interesting list. On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 01:02:28PM +0200, cedric wrote: May be someone has another feeling, but i've found today strange behaviors. 1. Copy Visible does not copie visible, but the visible of layer aspect. Explanation : just deactivate a channel (R for

Re: [Gimp-user] Thoughts about channels

2004-09-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: the most reliable Copy Visible for me has always been and will continue to be this: Image --Image --Merge Visible Layers (think about those options that you are presented, depending on what you need from this special layer each of