Hi,
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 20:57 -0500, Helen wrote:
> I love the GIMP, I admire the GIMP community immensely, and am
> reluctant to find a fault -- but I do believe
> that would be a worthwhile improvement.
I think I made it clear that such a change would have to happen in GTK+,
since that's whe
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 03:30:19 +0100, Jeffrey Brent McBeth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't believe you are. That is exactly the feature she wants.
No, I don't think it is. 'Save as' does change the filename, but it saves
a new file, leaving the old file on the disk. Sometimes that can be
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 08:11:08PM -0600, Bill Lee wrote:
> I use the "Save As" feature an awful lot. Am I missing something?
>
> Bill Lee
I don't believe you are. That is exactly the feature she wants.
My personal favorite is "Save a Copy", it allows me to make edits to a file,
and save off sn
I use the "Save As" feature an awful lot. Am I missing something?
Bill Lee
Helen wrote:
> With all due respect and admiration to the GIMP developers, I do believe
> that the inability to at least rename a file from the camera's default
> of dsc00405 to something meaningful is a serious impedime
With all due respect and admiration to the GIMP developers, I do believe
that the inability to at least rename a file from the camera's default of
dsc00405 to something meaningful is a serious impediment to convenient use
of the GIMP.
Once I have made some color adjustments, and maybe some croppin
* Robin Laing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-08-07 16:20]:
[...]
> In linux I use GQview for this purpose. I can browse files, delete,
> rename, etc. I can even open the image in gimp for editting. I
> don't know if I want GIMP to do this or not. Not the way I normally
> do things.
I agree and have
Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
> It depends on a person's workflow when retouching photos. If gimp is
> used from scratch without preliminary viewing photos in some browser, or
> some kind of retouching is used to decide if the file worth to stay, it
> would be better to allow simple deletion of s
Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
> It depends on a person's workflow when retouching photos. If gimp is
> used from scratch without preliminary viewing photos in some browser, or
> some kind of retouching is used to decide if the file worth to stay, it
> would be better to allow simple deletion of
It depends on a person's workflow when retouching photos. If gimp is
used from scratch without preliminary viewing photos in some browser, or
some kind of retouching is used to decide if the file worth to stay, it
would be better to allow simple deletion of selected file within GTK
file chooser
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 18:59 +0200, Dries Venter wrote:
> 'scuse me for butting in, but might the original post not be thinking in
> Windows Explorer terms? In Windows, the standard Save/Open file dialog
> box is also a mini-Explorer, in that one can rename/delete/copy files
> lik in normal
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Helen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-06-07 18:56]:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi
>
>> Is there a way to delete or rename a file in Gimp? I know I can save
>> with a different name, but then I have two copies.
>
> No
>
>> If not, is this an oversight?
>
> I think not.
>
>> Will it be co
From: Helen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Gimp-user] delete a file
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 18:53:20 -0500
> Hi,
> Is there a way to delete or rename a file in Gimp? I know I can save
> with a different name, but then I have two copies.
>
> If not, is this an oversight?
* Helen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-06-07 18:56]:
> Hi,
Hi
> Is there a way to delete or rename a file in Gimp? I know I can save
> with a different name, but then I have two copies.
No
> If not, is this an oversight?
I think not.
> Will it be corrected?
I see no reason. Gimp is a graphic edi
Hi,
Is there a way to delete or rename a file in Gimp? I know I can save
with a different name, but then I have two copies.
If not, is this an oversight? Will it be corrected?
Thanks,
Helen, using Gimp 2.2.10 on SuSE 10.2
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gi
14 matches
Mail list logo
