I'm trying to compile The Gimp 2.0.
I get the output below when running ./configure
checking for librsvg-2.0 >= 2.2.0... Package librsvg-2.0 was not found
in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `librsvg-2.0.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No
On Thursday 15 January 2004 17:31, Josenildo Marques wrote:
> I'm trying to compile The Gimp 2.0.
> I get the output below when running ./configure
>
>
> checking for librsvg-2.0 >= 2.2.0... Package librsvg-2.0 was not
> found in the pkg-config search path.
> Perhaps you should add the directory co
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 14:31, Josenildo Marques wrote:
> checking for librsvg-2.0 >= 2.2.0... Package librsvg-2.0 was not found
> in the pkg-config search path.
> Perhaps you should add the directory containing `librsvg-2.0.pc'
> to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
> No package 'librsvg-2.0'
Hi,
Josenildo Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to compile The Gimp 2.0.
> I get the output below when running ./configure
>
>
> checking for librsvg-2.0 >= 2.2.0... Package librsvg-2.0 was not found
> in the pkg-config search path.
> Perhaps you should add the directory containi
This is what I have :
librsvg2_2-2.4.0-1mdk
librsvg2_2-devel-2.4.0-1mdk
librsvg-2.4.0-1mdk
Tom
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 14:06, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Josenildo Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm trying to compile The Gimp 2.0.
> > I get the output below when running ./configu
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 19:27, Thomas Spuhler wrote:
> This is what I have :
>
> librsvg2_2-2.4.0-1mdk
> librsvg2_2-devel-2.4.0-1mdk
> librsvg-2.4.0-1mdk
>
>
> Tom
Hi.
It's done and I have already installed it. I's perfect !
However, I installed it with rpm -i and the docs (and probably other
stu
Hi,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] gimp-2.0pre1]# cd /usr/src/RPM/RPMS/i586/
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] i586]# l
> gimp-2.0pre1-1mdk.i586.rpm
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] i586]# urpmi gimp
> gimpgimp2-gap
> gimp1_3 gimp-data-extras
> gimp1_3-python gimp-doc
> gimp-2.0
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 22:04, Sven Neumann wrote:
> You should consider to rename the package to gimp2.0 or gimp2 so that
> the full package name becomes gimp2.0-2.0pre1 or gimp2-2.0pre1. Then
> it could coexist with the gimp package (that should have been called
> gimp1.2 to begin with).
I renamed
Hi,
Josenildo Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I renamed it to gimp2.0 and installed it.
> rpm -i -v gimp2.0-2.0pre1-1mdk.i586.rpm
>
> It is installed as gimp-1.3. Is this correct ?
Yes, the executable and the libraries will continue to be called 1.3
until the first release candidates for
