Guess they have server problems...again
When I sent the email, I went to the actual sites and cut and pasted the
address. Give
it a bit, then try again.
--- Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> * norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-24-07 16:20]:
> > Here is one tutorial on them :
> >
> > http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/topic/Shadows-And-Glows-3-d-Effects-4624-1.html
> >
> > And another :
> >
> > http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/topic/The-Layer-mask-
> Here is one tutorial on them :
>
> http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/topic/Shadows-And-Glows-3-d-Effects-4624-1.html
>
> And another :
>
> http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/topic/The-Layer-mask-Rendering-Method-18687-1.html
>
> They are also very handy for doing effects in GAP.
>
Tried both of thes
On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 15:29 -0500, Helen wrote:
> I'm trying to learn about layer masks.
> I'm probably missing something important, but seems to me
> that one can get the same result with less effort by simply
> erasing what one does not want in an image, and keeping
> what is left.
> Or is there
Masks give you a lot of control over things, plus, until you apply them, they
are non
destructive.
Here is one tutorial on them :
http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/topic/Shadows-And-Glows-3-d-Effects-4624-1.html
And another :
http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/topic/The-Layer-mask-Rendering-Method-1868
I'm trying to learn about layer masks.
I'm probably missing something important, but seems to me
that one can get the same result with less effort by simply
erasing what one does not want in an image, and keeping
what is left.
Or is there something different achieved by masking?
Thanks,
Helen, usin
