Alan Horkan a écrit :
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, Kevin Myers wrote:
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 20:24:18 -0600
From: Kevin Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Kevin Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] renaming the gimp
Please give my regards to the French,
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 07:31:21PM -0800, Gezim Hoxha wrote:
> > see, the rude parts in this email is in the refusal
> > to strip them
> > properly.
> I guess this is for my last reply. Here's the
> thing...I hit reply (in yahoo) and then forgetting
> that the default reply email goes not to the
> see, the rude parts in this email is in the refusal
> to strip them
> properly.
I guess this is for my last reply. Here's the
thing...I hit reply (in yahoo) and then forgetting
that the default reply email goes not to the list but
to the person who last replied, i wrote the nice
(short) reply..
see, the rude parts in this email is in the refusal to strip them
properly. please read:
http://www.gimp.org/mail_lists.html
jump right down to Mail List Etiquette
human beings are the worst species ever to crawl this planet. however,
email can be controled and this starts with you and how you
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, Kevin Myers wrote:
> Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 20:24:18 -0600
> From: Kevin Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Kevin Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] renaming the gimp
>
> Please give my regards to th
Before modern day liberals in France and their ilk have any ground to stand
on at all, maybe they might consider helping us for a change, rather than
selling weapons to Saddam Hussein for use on his countrymen and neighbors.
Didnt the americans also sell arms to iraq?
Please give my regards to the
Hi,
"Kevin Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Before modern day liberals in France and their ilk have any ground
> to stand on at all, maybe they might consider helping us for a
> change, rather than selling weapons to Saddam Hussein for use on his
> countrymen and neighbors.
Perhaps you shoul
PROTECTED]>
> To: "nate cockram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2004 6:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] renaming the gimp
>
>
> >
> > On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, nate cockram wrote:
> >
> > > Date:
This has got way OT already.
Please, no one send any other e-mail involving politics. Animosities
could explode on either side, and this won't help colaborative work
for Free Software, be it the GIMP or any other project.
There are apropriate channels on the internet for such arguing.
On Mond
PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2004 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] renaming the gimp
> Please give my regards to the French, and speaking of Liberty, you might
> want to recall who liberated France from German occupation, not once, but
> twice. A
n.
s/KAM
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Horkan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "nate cockram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2004 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] renaming the gimp
>
> On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, nate
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, nate cockram wrote:
> Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 13:34:59 -0500
> From: nate cockram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] renaming the gimp
>
> > To my mind changing the name now would be like
> > renaming the St
> Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 01:08:39 -0800 (PST)
> From: Gezim Hoxha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: gimp user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Gimp-user] renaming the gimp
>
> Hi all,
>
> I find the name GIMP not very attractive and I think
> if we want to market t
Tom wrote .
> The name is fine. It's unusual and easy to remember.
> It never made me think of a disabled person until it
> was mentioned here. ... PhotoChop? ... now that makes
> me think of 'butcher'.
Please follow this dictionary link:
http://dictionary.ref
Jakub Friedl Wrote
>> THe name should imply/tell something about the
>> application...GIMP doesn't say anything to me other
> With good brands it happens often the other way - Xerox comes to mind
> immediatelly. But there are many more such examples.
YES. Apple Computers, for example. Mac
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 09:39:32AM +1100, Owen Cook wrote:
>
> On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, Gezim Hoxha wrote:
>
> >
> > P.S: I know GIMP is an acronym, but [almost] no one
> > calls it GNU Image Manipulation Program either.
>
>
> Corrupt the acronym ..the "Great Image Manipulation Program"
>
> and if
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, Gezim Hoxha wrote:
>
> P.S: I know GIMP is an acronym, but [almost] no one
> calls it GNU Image Manipulation Program either.
Corrupt the acronym ..the "Great Image Manipulation Program"
and if you didn't do an install-strip, you might want to call it the
"Bloody Large Ima
On Sun, 07 Nov 2004 20:27:10 +0100
Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Gezim Hoxha wrote:
>
> > So what do YOU think, does the GIMP need a
> >name change?
> >
> >
> >
>
> PhotoChop, photochip, potatochip, potatocrop, protocrop, protoshop,
> protogimp, protochimp, photochamp, chomp, chump.
Gezim Hoxha wrote:
So what do YOU think, does the GIMP need a
name change?
PhotoChop, photochip, potatochip, potatocrop, protocrop, protoshop,
protogimp, protochimp, photochamp, chomp, chump
What about nimph? (nude image manipulation program hoho)
Andrew
_
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, Jakub Friedl (lists) wrote:
Very well put & a very good piece of software as well.
J Dietsch
> > But you can do a demo and it is better than they have a false knowledge
> > about it!
> Insightful remark. Gimp is the Gimp. Not a Photoshop clone. It
> shouldn't be the same and it
> To my mind changing the name now would be like
> renaming the Statue of Liberty to something like
> statue of false hope.
Hmm... well, now that you mention it...
:/
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/lis
Gezim Hoxha wrote:
Hi all,
I find the name GIMP not very attractive and I think
if we want to market the GIMP we need to do something
about this name (i.e. change it). I have friends ask
me "What program is that?" and the when they hear
"GIMP" it doesn't sound good, and it's hard to
remember. So wh
On Saturday 06 November 2004 11:08 pm, Gezim Hoxha wrote:
> I find the name GIMP not very attractive and I think
> if we want to market the GIMP we need to do something
> about this name (i.e. change it).
How about we call it "SNOT" or "PHLEGM?"
___
Gim
The name is fine. It's unusual and easy to remember.
It never made me think of a disabled person until it
was mentioned here. ... PhotoChop? ... now that makes
me think of 'butcher'.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berke
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 01:08:39AM -0800, Gezim Hoxha wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I find the name GIMP not very attractive and I think
> if we want to market the GIMP we need to do something
> about this name (i.e. change it).
well here you go. gimp is nice and doing just fine not being marketed.
Gezim Hoxha wrote:
Hi all,
I find the name GIMP not very attractive and I think
if we want to market the GIMP we need to do something
about this name (i.e. change it). I have friends ask
me "What program is that?" and the when they hear
"GIMP" it doesn't sound good, and it's hard to
remember. So wh
> THe name should imply/tell something about the
> application...GIMP doesn't say anything to me other
With good brands it happens often the other way - Xerox comes to mind
immediatelly. But there are many more such examples.
My experience is that many people around me mix all the similar names
-
> So I do not get what you do not like about the name.
> There are lots of free programs that do not have
> ideal names
> (some are really obscure), but the Gimp is one I
> really like.
>
> Jakub Friedl
THe name should imply/tell something about the
application...GIMP doesn't say anything to me
This one time, at band camp, regis rampnoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 07-Nov-2004 Kevin Waterson wrote:
>
> >> I find the name GIMP not very attractive and I think
> >> if we want to market the GIMP we need to do something
> >> about this name (i.e. change it). I have friends ask
> >> me
Yes, the GIMP does make you think of the disabled!!
Gezim Hoxha wrote:
Hi all,
I find the name GIMP not very attractive and I think
if we want to market the GIMP we need to do something
about this name (i.e. change it). I have friends ask
me "What program is that?" and the when they hear
"GIMP" it
> But you can do a demo and it is better than they have a false knowledge
> about it!
Insightful remark. Gimp is the Gimp. Not a Photoshop clone. It
shouldn't be the same and its name shouldn't imply it. It is an
original software.
___
Gimp-user mailing l
On 07-Nov-2004 Kevin Waterson wrote:
>> I find the name GIMP not very attractive and I think
>> if we want to market the GIMP we need to do something
>> about this name (i.e. change it). I have friends ask
>> me "What program is that?" and the when they hear
But you can do a demo and it is bette
> remember. So what do YOU think, does the GIMP need a
> name change?
No. The name is very nice and many people already know it.
It is a good brand. Even people that never used it often heard about
the Gimp.
And the name is very easy to remember. It is only 4 letters short
and it has a meaning - G
This one time, at band camp, Gezim Hoxha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I find the name GIMP not very attractive and I think
> if we want to market the GIMP we need to do something
> about this name (i.e. change it). I have friends ask
> me "What program is that?" and the when they hear
On Sunday, November 07, 2004 7:08 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Gezim Hoxha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So what do YOU think, does the GIMP need a
name change?
Well, as you ask, I do NOT think a name change is needed. The GIMP is great!
The name is fine, and it's not a name I have trouble remembering.
Bob Long
Hi all,
I find the name GIMP not very attractive and I think
if we want to market the GIMP we need to do something
about this name (i.e. change it). I have friends ask
me "What program is that?" and the when they hear
"GIMP" it doesn't sound good, and it's hard to
remember. So what do YOU think, d
36 matches
Mail list logo