Hi guys,
I use GIMP all the time for web.
Has anyone already did any research for best practices to export JPG from
GIMP? file size/quality wise...
Is there any good plugin for export?
Thanks,
Adir
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.or
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Adir Kol wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I use GIMP all the time for web.
> Has anyone already did any research for best practices to export JPG from
> GIMP? file size/quality wise...
> Is there any good plugin for export?
You mean like this one here?
http://registry.gimp.o
yeah.. This plugin is great, I'll try it - Thanks!
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Adir Kol wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I use GIMP all the time for web.
> > Has anyone already did any research for be
Thank you developers for your patience and hard work. I've heard far too much
bashing of the save/export change. Change is just too had and scary for some it
seems. I have been one of the silent masses for far too long.
I am one who has said nothing till now, but I greatly appreciate the new
Am 01.07.2012 11:55, schrieb Dave Helgert:
> I greatly appreciate the new save/export features of Gimp. It simplifies my
> workflow greatly as I often save/export as both jpg and xcf. I realized the
> benefits of saving to xcf the hard way and now save important steps as hidden
> layers so I can
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Johannes wrote:
> Therefore I suggest to make the new "fool proof" workflow optional, so
> everybody can be happy.
This has been suggested before. The answer was "no" ever time and
won't become a "yes" no matter how actively you keep pushing.
Alexandre Prokoudine
Am 01.07.2012 12:27, schrieb Alexandre Prokoudine:
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Johannes wrote:
>
>> Therefore I suggest to make the new "fool proof" workflow optional, so
>> everybody can be happy.
>
> This has been suggested before. The answer was "no" ever time and
> won't become a "yes"
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Johannes wrote:
> If the "no's" you mentioned have been lacking arguments like this "no",
> then it's not surprising that the community keeps pushing.
First of all, the community isn't pushing. You are not the community,
nor few dozens of people are.
Also, it _was
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:43 PM, houghi wrote:
>> > If the "no's" you mentioned have been lacking arguments like this "no",
>> > then it's not surprising that the community keeps pushing.
>>
>> First of all, the community isn't pushing. You are not the community,
>> nor few dozens of people are.
>
> Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 03:23:23 -0700
> From: kwarner...@verizon.net
> To: strata_ran...@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Why I went back from GIMP 2.8 to 2.6.x
>
> > Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.
>
> nor do they explain the stubbornness of the develo
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:09 PM, houghi wrote:
>> > Also I would be interested in knowing if the
>> > default can be changed easily. e.g. I always work with jpg files.
>>
>> It can't.
>
> Well, that seriously sucks. From how I read it, it is because of what GIMP
> wants, not what the user wants.
T
Hi,
I have been using GIMP for more years than I care to remember. I don't have the
knowhow to contribute anything of value to the project (and probably wouldn't
have either the dedication or time if I did) but both single window mode and
the export process have both made things far better. I a
Johannes wrote,
Am 01.07.2012 11:55, schrieb Dave Helgert:
I greatly appreciate the new save/export features of Gimp. It simplifies my
workflow greatly as I often save/export as both jpg and xcf. I realized the
benefits of saving to xcf the hard way and now save important steps as hidden
lay
Why I switched back to 2.6:
Sliders- too weird for digital painting with a tablet. I would like more visual
feedback perhaps, like changing the color of the actual bar, or something more
obvious. Still, it's tough to quickly just do what you need. Other options:
shift or ctrl drag for fine tun
>I used to convert them to indexed so their size would be reduced. Since I
>installed a new version, the semi-transparency is cut off and I have just
>plain black on transparent background as if there were no antialiasing, very
>ugly.
I too used to use the ability to create indexed color pngs
Am 02.07.2012 01:22, schrieb Bob Long:
>
> I'm a light-weight user (Windows). The most common process I do is:
>
> Drag a BMP image into GIMP.
> Crop using fixed aspect ratio - very handy for my purposes.
> Scale image.
> File|Overwrite
> Exit (close without saving).
>
> I'm not negating the f
16 matches
Mail list logo
