On 09/10/2012 07:09 PM, Simon Budig wrote:
Ken Warner (kwarner...@verizon.net) wrote:
And your insistence that your design decisions are right even while
the user community tells you otherwise is strictly amateur.
See, here you're disregarding my assertion that we got a lot of positive
On 09/10/2012 11:30 PM, Daniel Hauck wrote:
I too have ranted about this topic. Not to get into it again, I would
like to point out a couple of things:
1. This change doesn't remove functionality. It only moves it.
The problem is that gimp arbitrarily separates the types of files: .xcf
and
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:52 AM, maderios wrote:
1. This change doesn't remove functionality. It only moves it.
The problem is that gimp arbitrarily separates the types of files
Not arbitrarily, but on purpose and by design.
May I ask why you keep making incorrect statements for which you
On 09/11/2012 09:01 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
May I ask why you keep making incorrect statements for which you
apologize later anyway?
Hi
Reread what I wrote above. Do not distort what I meant. Thanks...
Greetings
--
Maderios
___
Hi,
The wait is over! GIMP Magazine has launched.
Download it at http://gimpmagazine.org/issue1ThanksThe GIMP Magazine Team!P.S.
GIMP Magazine was downloaded over 10,000 times within the first 24 hours!
You should check out my blog at www.steveczajka.posterous.com or follow me on
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:11 AM, maderios wrote:
Reread what I wrote above. Do not distort what I meant. Thanks...
Perhaps you don't understand the meaning of the word arbitrary?
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arbitrary
The distinction isn't arbitrary. It's a design decision.
On 09/11/2012 09:29 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:11 AM, maderios wrote:
Reread what I wrote above. Do not distort what I meant. Thanks...
Perhaps you don't understand the meaning of the word arbitrary?
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arbitrary
maderios schreef op di 11-09-2012 om 08:52 [+0200]:
1. This change doesn't remove functionality. It only moves it.
The problem is that gimp arbitrarily separates the types of files: .xcf
and others. This does not happen like this in the work. We work
indifferently on all file types.
Maybe
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Maarten De Munck wrote:
If you are really really annoyed by this behaviour, use 2.6, start a
fork, ask/pay someone to start a fork for you, use another image
editor, ...,
No need to. There already is a fork.
https://github.com/mskala/noxcf-gimp
Alexandre
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:55 PM, EyeLand wrote:
Hello, how can autoconvert many photo files from eps to jpg with GIMP?
Mmm... Photo files in EPS? That's a novel thing :)
Depends of the operating system you are on. Any clues?
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
On 09/11/2012 11:45 AM, Maarten De Munck wrote:
maderios schreef op di 11-09-2012 om 08:52 [+0200]:
1. This change doesn't remove functionality. It only moves it.
The problem is that gimp arbitrarily separates the types of files: .xcf
and others. This does not happen like this in the work. We
I have many logo files in eps and I want to convert all in jpg.
MS Windows 7 SP1 x86
2012/9/11 gimp-user-list-requ...@gnome.org
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:58:33 +0400
From: Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user]
On 09/11/2012 05:05 AM, Daniel Hauck wrote:
On 09/11/2012 04:25 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:
My word processor responds to control-s by saving the open
document in its own native format, which does not happen to be
suitable for distribution to end users. [etc]
Which word processor might that be?
On 09/11/2012 11:49 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Maarten De Munck wrote:
If you are really really annoyed by this behaviour, use 2.6, start a
fork, ask/pay someone to start a fork for you, use another image
editor, ...,
No need to. There already is a fork.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
On a Microsoft platform, you should be able to install Imagemagick
in Cygwin - if it's worth the bother. Since you have a lof of
files to process, it probably will be.
Steve,
This is an overkill. Just install Phatch ;)
* maderios mader...@gmail.com [09-11-12 06:15]:
...
It's really very simple:
Photoshop / Saving images
Save a file
Use the Save command to save changes to the current file or the Save As
command to save changes to a different file.
That's good news! I wish that effort all success.
On 9/11/2012 2:49 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Maarten De Munck wrote:
If you are really really annoyed by this behaviour, use 2.6, start a
fork, ask/pay someone to start a fork for you, use another image
GIMP creates a file with .ora extension, but it's, obviously, corrupted -
MyPaint, Krita and GIMP itself
won't recognize it as such ('unknown file extension' kind of error
messages).
GIMP 2.8.2, Windows-64bit here.
My old ORA files created with MyPaint and Krita or 2.6/2.8.0 versions of
GIMP
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Nik Omul wrote:
Is anybody else having the same problem or is it just me?
Windows, Linux users? Mac OS? GIMP 2.8.2 version only.
GIMP 2.8.2, Linux, 32bit, loads its own ORA files just fine.
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
please remove me from the mail list___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Please point me to instructions on how to install the UFRAW plugin for the Mac
native version of GIMP (2.8.2).
I have searched, but everything I find says that UFRAW is included with Mac
builds of GIMP. This seems to be true for versions that run under X11, but not
for the native build.
--
On 09/11/2012 08:38 AM, maderios wrote:
Hi
I'm not developper but I think it is certainly possible to give the
choice in the configuration.
Yes, but it's a bad idea. Having all the people using more or less the
same Gimp is beneficial. The same tutorials work everywhere, and the
people
Please point me to instructions on how to install the UFRAW plugin for the Mac
native version of GIMP (2.8.2).
I have searched, but everything I find says that UFRAW is included with Mac
builds of GIMP. This seems to be true for versions that run under X11, but not
for the native build.
Never
The obvious design that satisfies both groups has been offered several times
and has been derided as --- I don't know why, although numerous attempts to
justify the current design has been proffered.
On 9/11/2012 4:52 PM, Ofnuts wrote:
On 09/11/2012 08:38 AM, maderios wrote:
Hi
I'm not
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:50:54 -0700
From: kwarner...@verizon.net
To: ofn...@laposte.net
CC: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] About bad new save export function in Gimp-2.8
The obvious design that satisfies both groups has been offered several times
and has been
25 matches
Mail list logo
