You put Python scripts in the plug-ins directory and not the scripts
directory. Python scripts also need to be marked as executable. The
scripts
directory is only for Script-Fu scripts.
~~~
Re: Missing Script Fu Layers
* glow7 for...@gimpusers.com [02-28-13 03:35]:
You put Python scripts in the plug-ins directory and not the scripts
directory. Python scripts also need to be marked as executable. The
scripts
directory is only for Script-Fu scripts.
Just recently upgraded from Gimp 2.7 to 2.8.4 and I'm
glow7 wrote:
Re: Missing Script Fu Layers beveled/embossed in the new Gimp 2.8.4
Hello, Just recently upgraded from Gimp 2.7 to 2.8.4 and I'm totally
lost when it comes to Script FU and new to python. Is the
above-mentioned feature revised and renamed in Gimp 2.8.4? or did they
eliminated
Wow. I decided to see if this was an issue for anyone else - I guess it is. I
think I pretty well understand the arguments on both sides, and I have to say
that I hope one of the many reasonable solutions proposed here is implemented.
There really are legitimately different uses of the tool, and a
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:58 AM, pbft wrote:
I just need to make edits on a few hundred JPGs with the least possible
effort.
And an old-fashioned image editor is, of course, the best tool for
this kind of job, isn't it?
What ever do all these nutheads invent lightrooms and darktables for? :)
Sorry to pipe in here. I hope I am the only list responder. I'm
against the behavior, but I'm MORE against further discussion of it.
So please, if you would like to respond to this comment, let's not
clutter the list any further. I hope the FAQ regarding this and other
topics arrives soon so
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
Sorry to pipe in here. I hope I am the only list responder. I'm
against the behavior, but I'm MORE against further discussion of it.
Ugh, sorry :)
(But I guess I never said I appreciate GiMP... I do. I teach it to
others on a regular basis.
