Hi all,
I don't get it! This discussion is going on for months now, constantly
spamming the mailing list. Still I don't see even the slightest
willingness to compromise on either side. It seems you are carrying out
a war with hardened fronts on the back of GIMP which will give neither
side a
Am 12.07.2013 22:43, schrieb Mikael Ståldal:
Is there an easy way in GIMP to invert the alpha channel of an image?
Transparent should be opaque, opaque should be transparent, almost
transparent should be almost opaque, etc.
Yes, there is:
1. Choose "Colors -> Components -> Decompose" from the
Actually I know nobody who likes the new distinction between save and
export.
But the whole discussion seems to be at a point of no return anyway and
developers seem to defend the change as a matter of principle rather
than aiming for maximum usability, so it seems quite improbable anything
w
Am 10.06.2013 03:14, schrieb Steve Kinney:
I wonder about how the interface would represent the edge of the
canvas, without shading image content that goes past the edge - a
problem if editing that content - or drawing lines effectively the
same as guide lines to show the canvas boundary. In the
Thanks for the workarounds, I appreciate them very much!
But to summarize, this seems to be an issue not just for me, right? So
is there a reason GIMP doesn't support off-canvas editing out-of-the-box
to make such workarounds unnecessary?
I mean, would there be any downsides of allowing editing
Hello everybody,
I don't now if this is just a stupid question or if this is a software
limitation or if there is even a setting for it I haven't found yet but
why are we not able to edit layers outside the canvas?
I often create images were the canvas size is fixed (e.g. display
resolution)