It appears to me that virtually every photograph I have ever manipulated
using GIMP has looked better after applying GIMP's Colors->Levels->Auto to it.
Now, I have a batch of about 80+ scans of old family photos that I would
like to apply this process to en mass.
If I wanted to script this, you
In message <4f763699.3000...@gmail.com>,
Stefan Maerz wrote:
>On 03/30/2012 03:19 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>> Anyway, a relative just sent me an old old family photo that some nitwit,
>> perhaps a generation or two ago, did some seriously violence to with a pai
I've been using gimp for awhile now and have had great success using it
to retouch about a zillion scans of old family photographs. but other than
then few things I need in order to do that (paintbrush, clone tool, rotate
tool and crop) I am still largely ignorant of how to use gimp. (There's
ju
In message <4f0b705b.2070...@pilobilus.net>,
Steve Kinney wrote:
>On 01/09/2012 05:15 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>> I did that, and actually, yes, the specific image I'm working with seems to
>> have benefitted from having the defringer run on it twice. Here&#x
In message
, Chris Mohler wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
> wrote:
>> =C2=A0But contrary to the directions on the page listed
>> above, this new script _does not_ appear to be showing up underneath
>> Filters->Script-Fu
>
>The menu l
OK, so now that I've got my image oriantation all sorted out, now I have
a different problem...
I just took this shot, which I kind-of like, and I've already cropped &
reoriented it:
ftp://ftp.tristatelogic.com/private/gimp/squirrel-b.jpg
Unfortunately, however if you look close you'll see
In message
, Christen Anderson wrote:
>Image --> Transform --> Rotate
Um, yea! That's what I was looking for. (I knew it had to be there somewhere.)
Thanks!
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/li
What is the proper way, using gimp, to correct the orientation of an
image?
For example, I just took a shot with one of my cameras where I was
holding the camera in a vertical (portrait) orientation. But when I
transfer the .JPG to my PeeCee and view it with gimp (or ImageMagick)
it is laying o
In message <01c30197$7abe94a0$703bbde0$@gmail.com>,
"Marci Davis" wrote:
>My 11-year old daughter installed Gimp on our laptop. Shortly after, we
>started having trouble with speed and resolution. Gimp will not open, nor
>can we uninstall it. In fact, when I try, it crashes the computer.
In message
, Frank Gore wrote:
>http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/373
>
>I've used Digikam for my photo collections for years.
Hey! Thanks a bunch! I didn't know about that one at all.
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
http:
In message
, Frank Gore wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
> wrote:
>>
>> Anyway, I just now went and resarched it and found that the Lumix cameras
>> produce their raw images into something called .RW2 files.
>
>Might be worth checkin
In message <20111231215523.gt25...@wahoo.no-ip.org>,
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>Guess I should do the entire job :^)
>
>http://ufraw.sourceforge.net/Cameras.html
Yes, thanks. I saw that too. But if you will recall, is was just earlier
today that Frank Gore wrote:
>Yeah, the current version
In message <20111231215357.gs25...@wahoo.no-ip.org>,
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>* Ronald F. Guilmette [12-31-11 16:42]:
>> I've been planning on buying a Lumix DMC-FZ150 next year, when the prices
>> come down some more.
>
>...
>
>> I'd just like
In message
, Frank Gore wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
> wrote:
>> Only if you mean DCRaw. Because UFRaw development pretty much
>> stagnated. Two releases in last two years. Compare that to ACR.
>
>Yeah, the current version of UFraw is pretty far behind. Gimp doe
In message <253415241.1190746.1325133986615.javamail.r...@vms228.mailsrvcs.net>
, to...@verizon.net wrote:
> I didn't have time to read this whole thread, so pardon me if it's
>already been
>pointed out that the idea of changing the name of GIMP has come up more
>than
>once in the past.
>
>My vot
Many thanks to both Steve Kinney and Daniel Smith for their various
suggestions for fixing this damaged color image. I'm not sure that I
can do all the thinsg they've suggested, given my limited knowledge
of The Gimp at this point, or even that I understand them all, but I'm
going to go over all
In message <4ef8950f.6050...@pilobilus.net>,
Steve Kinney wrote:
>You won't find a "one tool" or "one filter" solution for this one.
:-(
>This is a fairly major project. However, rest assured it can be
>done; check out the first image on this page:
>http://pilobilus.net/photo_rework.html
In message
, Daniel Smith wrote:
>Hey Ronald
>From what I understand, slides are open to the same kind
>of degradation that any plastic is...
Not that it makes any real difference to anything, but I just feel compelled
to clarify again that the image I posted a link to was_not_ from a ``slide'
The following file was generated from a recent scan of a 40 year old
6x7cm color negative:
ftp://ftp.tristatelogic.com/private/gimp/img001-b.jpg
Despite the fact that the negative in question has been stored for the
past 30+ years in a manner that I personally would have judged to be
``safe''
19 matches
Mail list logo
