[Gimp-user] GIMP 2.8 usability discussion - Argument consolidation and referencing

2012-07-14 Thread Johannes
Having followed the discussions on the GIMP usability changes for some weeks now, what I am missing most is a direct comparison of arguments. Therefore let's consolidate the consensus and the arguments pro and contra Making the new open/save/export behavior of GIMP 2.8 optional by giving

Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP 2.8 usability discussion - Argument consolidation and referencing

2012-07-14 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Johannes wrote: Having followed the discussions on the GIMP usability changes for some weeks now, what I am missing most is a direct comparison of arguments. Therefore let's consolidate the consensus and the arguments pro and contra Making the new

Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP 2.8 usability discussion - Argument consolidation and referencing

2012-07-14 Thread Ken Warner
Well, that is the question isn't it? On 7/14/2012 7:34 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Johannes wrote: Having followed the discussions on the GIMP usability changes for some weeks now, what I am missing most is a direct comparison of arguments. Therefore

Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP 2.8 usability discussion - Argument consolidation and referencing

2012-07-14 Thread Johannes
Am 14.07.2012 16:45, schrieb Chris Mohler: You can: A: Bitch B: Adapt C: Fork I suggest option B or C - they're likely to be the most productive. In fact, I am preparing option B. Precondition for this is a good understanding of what is to be adapted. I don't want my changes to be

Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP 2.8 usability discussion - Argument consolidation and referencing

2012-07-14 Thread Johannes
Am 14.07.2012 19:24, schrieb Johannes: not cast perls before people without arguments. ...and no pearls, too. -- Johannes ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP 2.8 usability discussion - Argument consolidation and referencing

2012-07-14 Thread Michael Schumacher
On 14.07.2012 19:24, Johannes wrote: Am 14.07.2012 16:45, schrieb Chris Mohler: You can: A: Bitch B: Adapt C: Fork I suggest option B or C - they're likely to be the most productive. In fact, I am preparing option B. Precondition for this is a good understanding of what is to be adapted.

Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP 2.8 usability discussion - Argument consolidation and referencing

2012-07-14 Thread scott s.
On 7/14/2012 04:45, Chris Mohler wrote: On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Johannes anonfo...@gmx.org wrote: This is the consensus so far (correct me if I am wrong): ### CORRECTED There are a handful of people developing GIMP. They are following this:

Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP 2.8 usability discussion - Argument consolidation and referencing

2012-07-14 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 4:56 AM, scott s. wrote: It seems to me that opening vice import has many of the same issues/ useability requirements that should be considered. In particular, a problem I encounter with workflow in GIMP is that GIMP doesn't really handle (AFAIK) meta-data embedded