From: l...@holoweb.net
To: for...@gimpusers.com
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 19:21:20 -0400
CC: t...@gimpusers.com; gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Thank you developers, for your patience.
On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 12:23 +0200, eduperez wrote:
In my humble opinion, the quid
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:23:52 +0200, eduperez wrote:
In my
humble opinion, the quid of the question regarding the new save /
export policy, relies on the fact that the new behaviour reflects a
change in the intended audience for the project: the old load JPEG +
edit + save JPEG serves
Am 05.07.2012 12:23, schrieb eduperez:
[...] the old load JPEG + edit + save JPEG serves perfectly to a casual user,
who just needs a very basic image editor[...]
Disagreed. The length and the shape of the workflow doesn't tell
anything about the features of GIMP being used. You can use the
On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 12:23 +0200, eduperez wrote:
In my humble opinion, the quid of the question regarding the new
save / export policy, relies on the fact that the new behaviour
reflects a change in the intended audience for the project: the old
load JPEG + edit + save JPEG serves perfectly
* Johannes anonfo...@gmx.org [01-01-70 12:34]:
I can live with the new process, too. The only thing I am missing is to
do the Exit (close without saving) step directly (after having
overwritten the original BMP/JPEG/PNG/whatever).
At the moment, Exit (close without saving) is a two-step
On Jul 2, 2012 9:21 PM, Daniel Smith opened...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been reading a lot of these down the nose developer vs user
emails for what seems like a year now? And it strikes me how much this
I guess is really a possible byproduct of open source development,
though I think there are
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Smith wrote:
I've been reading a lot of these down the nose developer vs user
emails for what seems like a year now? And it strikes me how much this
I guess is really a possible byproduct of open source development,
though I think there are many OS
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 18:18:00 +0400
From: alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Thank you developers, for your patience.
...the discussion that isn't supposed to be happening anyway, given the
already explained status quo, which is: we
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 06:18:00PM +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
[...]
What I've learned is that no matter how patiently you explain things
or how carefully you choose words, someone somewhere will always get
things utterly wrong, overreact and annoy.
Yes that is a fact. Just accept it.
Thank you developers for your patience and hard work. I've heard far too much
bashing of the save/export change. Change is just too had and scary for some it
seems. I have been one of the silent masses for far too long.
I am one who has said nothing till now, but I greatly appreciate the new
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Johannes wrote:
If the no's you mentioned have been lacking arguments like this no,
then it's not surprising that the community keeps pushing.
First of all, the community isn't pushing. You are not the community,
nor few dozens of people are.
Also, it _was_
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:43 PM, houghi wrote:
If the no's you mentioned have been lacking arguments like this no,
then it's not surprising that the community keeps pushing.
First of all, the community isn't pushing. You are not the community,
nor few dozens of people are.
So how many
...@gnome.org
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 20:36:11
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Thank you developers, for your patience.
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:09 PM, houghi wrote:
Also I would be interested in knowing if the
default can be changed easily. e.g. I always work with jpg files
Am 02.07.2012 01:22, schrieb Bob Long:
I'm a light-weight user (Windows). The most common process I do is:
Drag a BMP image into GIMP.
Crop using fixed aspect ratio - very handy for my purposes.
Scale image.
File|Overwrite filename
Exit (close without saving).
I'm not negating the
14 matches
Mail list logo
