>There's more than you might think, especially if you can scan at 16
>bits per channel (16 bit grey or 48 colour), and are using rawtherapee
>or darktable or the unstable 2.9 gimp.
>You've lost some detail in the shadows but you've done really well in
>the lower right. There are books about restori
>Hmm.
>I said that, and now I go take a look at gimpusers.com, and I can't
>tell what
>notificati...@gimpusers.com means. It may be an address that the
>gimpusers.com forum automatically adds to posts from their web UI. So,
>until I find out more about that, mea culpa. It was advice I shouldn't
>ha
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 17:52 +0100, Denzo wrote:
> >
> In the photo I was working on the photo was so poor in places that I
> couldn't
> actually see much detail - so not a lot to lose.
There's more than you might think, especially if you can scan at 16
bits per channel (16 bit grey or 48 colour),
Hmm.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Denzo wrote:
>>Sending questions to notifications@ is not necessary. :/
I said that, and now I go take a look at gimpusers.com, and I can't tell what
notificati...@gimpusers.com means. It may be an address that the
gimpusers.com forum automatically adds to p
>Sending questions to notifications@ is not necessary. :/
>
>About your question, I'll offer my opinion.
>Doubly emphasize that.
>This is something that many people do not understand.
>
>Every edit you make to an image removes or alters some of the original
>information in the image. That means tha
Sending questions to notifications@ is not necessary. :/
About your question, I'll offer my opinion.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Denzo wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Ofnuts wrote:
> [...]
>>It's likely to be due to silver salts migration that make the surface
>>of
>>the photo r
>It's likely to be due to silver salts migration that make the surface
>of
>the photo reflective in the dark areas. Very hard to remove with an
>image editor. The best cure to it to take a picture of the original
>photo with a side lighting that isn't reflected back in the camera
>lens
Many than
On 18/11/16 16:58, Denzo wrote:
Can anyone point me to a good tutorial? I want to remove fading (or maybe it's
glare from an old flash?) in one area of an old black and white family photo. I
have checked YouTube for tutorials. Many thanks.
It's likely to be due to silver salts migration that ma
Can anyone point me to a good tutorial? I want to remove fading (or maybe it's
glare from an old flash?) in one area of an old black and white family photo. I
have checked YouTube for tutorials. Many thanks.
--
Denzo (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___