On recent Ubuntus, from 18.04 you need a gimp-python package (name from
memory) to enable Python support in Gimp. Gimp uses Python 2.7.
On 4/27/19 6:57 PM, garan wrote:
Since Gimp 2.10.10 I neither have a Python-Fu entry nor are my Gimp Python
scripts accessible.
* Operating system: Linux (L
Since Gimp 2.10.10 I neither have a Python-Fu entry nor are my Gimp Python
scripts accessible.
* Operating system: Linux (Lubuntu).
* Package: ppa (otto-kesselgulasch)
The call:
$ gimp --verbose --console-messages
is answered by the system:
(...)
Querying plug-in: '/usr/lib/gimp/
Since Gimp 2.10.10 I neither have a Python-Fu entry nor are my Gimp Python
scripts accessible.
* Operating system: Linux (Lubuntu).
* Package: ppa (otto-kesselgulasch)
The call:
$ gimp --verbose --console-messages
is answered by the system:
(...)
Querying plug-in: '/usr/lib/gimp/
__
>From: gimp-user-list on behalf of
uga...@talktalk.net
>Sent: 23 March 2016 10:22
>To: ofn...@gmx.com; gimp-user-list@gnome.org
>Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu
>
>Intersting idea, but running Python interactively before launching
GIMP
>doe
March 2016 10:22
To: ofn...@gmx.com; gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu
Intersting idea, but running Python interactively before launching GIMP
does not seem to make a noticeable difference.
Thanks.
>Original Message
>From: ofn...@gmx.com
>
Intersting idea, but running Python interactively before launching GIMP
does not seem to make a noticeable difference.
Thanks.
>Original Message
>From: ofn...@gmx.com
>Date: 22/03/2016 21:04
>To:
>Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu
>
>On 22/03/16 21:3
I take the point.
Thanks.
>Original Message
>From: ke...@ve3syb.ca
>Date: 22/03/2016 20:34
>To:
>Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu
>
>On 16-03-22 03:04 PM, uga...@talktalk.net wrote:
>> I don't see the difference to be about efficiency.
Here is the link: http://gimpbook.com/scripting/gimp-script-templates/pyui.py
>Original Message
>From: payn...@hotmail.com
>Date: 22/03/2016 19:51
>To: "gimp-user-list@gnome.org"
>Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu
>
>As you haven't provide
On 22/03/16 21:34, Kevin Cozens wrote:
On 16-03-22 03:04 PM, uga...@talktalk.net wrote:
I don't see the difference to be about efficiency. There is noticeable
lag when executing python-fu.
Script-Fu is always loaded in memory when GIMP starts. For Python
scripts the Python interpreter must be
On 16-03-22 03:04 PM, uga...@talktalk.net wrote:
I don't see the difference to be about efficiency. There is noticeable
lag when executing python-fu.
Script-Fu is always loaded in memory when GIMP starts. For Python scripts
the Python interpreter must be loaded before it can run the script. Th
it's entirely dependent on what you are trying to do.
Kevin
From: gimp-user-list on behalf of
uga...@talktalk.net
Sent: 22 March 2016 19:04
To: ofn...@gmx.com; gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu
I don't see t
the UI. I note show_py_ui.py is a smaller
file size, 3kb compared to test-sphere.scm's 6kb (12kb inc comments).
Is it just me on pre-build OSX?
Thanks.
-u
>Original Message
>From: ofn...@gmx.com
>Date: 22/03/2016 16:34
>To:
>Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu
>
&
On 22/03/16 12:27, uga...@talktalk.net wrote:
Is there a known performance issue for python-fu compared with script-
fu?
I have a pair of comparable scripts, and I find python-fu to be
noticeably lagged.
I am running 2.8.16 on OSX.
-u
A script is normally just glue around operations carried
Is there a known performance issue for python-fu compared with script-
fu?
I have a pair of comparable scripts, and I find python-fu to be
noticeably lagged.
I am running 2.8.16 on OSX.
-u
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-li
ginal Message
>From: ofn...@gmx.com
>Date: 20/03/2016 22:47
>To:
>Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu
>
>On 20/03/16 18:59, uga...@talktalk.net wrote:
>> I am having issues creating Python-fu scripts that seem to be editor
>> related. I have a number of editors, but
On 20/03/16 18:59, uga...@talktalk.net wrote:
I am having issues creating Python-fu scripts that seem to be editor
related. I have a number of editors, but only one works with python-
fu!
To illustrate; I am unable to use the Atom to author/create python-fu
scripts. It isn't an issue with the sc
I am having issues creating Python-fu scripts that seem to be editor
related. I have a number of editors, but only one works with python-
fu!
To illustrate; I am unable to use the Atom to author/create python-fu
scripts. It isn't an issue with the script. E.g. I create a new python
document us
On 12/31/2012 12:54 PM, chaouche yacine wrote:
Hello. I have a gif animation that has 190 layers. It's a too much. I want to
remove one out of three layers via the python-fu console. Here's what I did :
image = gimp.image_list()[0]
image.layers = [layer for (index,layer) in enumerate(image.lay
Hello. I have a gif animation that has 190 layers. It's a too much. I want to
remove one out of three layers via the python-fu console. Here's what I did :
>>> image = gimp.image_list()[0]
>>> image.layers = [layer for (index,layer) in enumerate(image.layers) if index
>>> % 3]
Traceback (most
19 matches
Mail list logo
